NJ Cops Jan18 | Page 20

Local Representation Understanding past practice Many terms and conditions of employment are contained in the collective negotiations agreement (“CNA” or “contract”) between the employer and a PBA Local. Just as many nev- er make it into the final negotiated agreement. Few employers, if any, have the patience to sit and negotiate every single term and condition JAMES M. of employment, which is one reason why main- METS, ESQ. tenance of benefits, maintenance of standards and past practice clauses are so prevalent in PBA contracts. These clauses usually require the em- ployer to maintain the terms and conditions of employment not contained in the CNA at the same level as they were prior to negotiations. Even if a CNA does not contain such a clause, the employer cannot simply change negotiable terms and conditions of employment that do not appear in the contract. Doing so is a violation of BRIAN J. MANETTA, ESQ. past practice. Despite the prevalence of past practices in an 20 NEW JERSEY COPS ■ JANUARY 2018 officer’s work life, the concept is often misunderstood. A PBA unit member with a grievance may be quick to say, “The em- ployer can’t do that! There is a past practice!” Prior to making a past practice argument, however, the PBA must do its due diligence and thoroughly investigate the grievance. In many cases, the employer’s action will violate a contractual pro- vision, and the grievance will not need to rely solely on the past practice. In others, a past practice may shed light on the meaning of ambiguous contract language. We have seen an increase in the number of past practice grievances being filed. This article defines past practices and how to use them. A past practice is an implied term of the CNA. A past prac- tice is created when both the PBA and the employer respond to a recurring situation in the same way over a long period of time. By repeating their response, the parties either implicitly or explicitly recognize the response as appropriate. Arbitrators generally agree that in the absence of a written agreement on a specific item, a binding past practice must be consistent, clear and acted upon, as well as ascertainable over a reasonable period of time. Case law of the New Jersey