NJ Cops Aug2017 | Page 30

SQUEEZE CONTINUED FROM PAGE 29 Warning signs In a perfect world, all towns and counties considering con- solidation would interface with the PBA in an attempt attempt to commit to what Sweeney intimated is always a working ob- jective in Gloucester: Officers who have been on the job long before elected officials took office should be there a long time after. Of course, there are other warning signs that consolidation might be on the agenda. Two-percent cap issues can become exacerbated when a department struggles with the overtime budget due to manpower shortages. The cost of hiring and training in towns that don’t pay commensurate with market value also can create persistent budget strains. And then there’s the pain that comes throughout the check- erboard makeup of New Jersey. Ciattarelli emphasized that one of the drivers in the Somerset study stemmed from having 19 chiefs with 19 different direct reports. “Every one of the 19 de- partments is doing the best job given its resources, but there is a lot of disparity in service,” he adds. “There may be a more efficient law enforcement structure.” If any or all of the above seems to be coming down the pike, what is a Local to do? Sometimes, a municipality might be in such a rush to pursue consolidation that it neglects to involve the PBA at the Local or state level. And some towns might even resort to the sneak attack of putting discussion on an agenda for a council meeting at the last minute, leaving a PBA Local no chance to respond, let alone prepare. “Funding government is getting expensive, but at the end of the day you don’t want to sacrifice service, because a strong police d