Nicht Sehr Bekannt, Umweltfreundliche Wassertechnologien Für Die.. Effektive, Niedrige Kosten, Nicht Sehr Bekannt... | Page 332

“Free Energy” Impact,
Breaking Power Balance: Who Might Lose?
• Oil, N-gas, Coal related; Infra, Storage, Transport, Chemical process(eg “free”
electrolysis of water & cryogenic air for nitrogen to make Nitrogen
fertilizer/Ammonia, Chemical separation by "freely compressed air” operated
Vortex tube) :
lower cost, develop new industrial process & product,
end-use R&D(eg mix with HHO, use Super Critical water for refining/liquifying,
Use shallow CoalBed Methane or Gas Hydrate, incorporate CO2 recovery
hydrocarbon production – see below),
• Also their "fossil fuel" groups' geopolitical gain might exist if they use abiotic
hydrocarbon production idea that is at least partially virtually undeniable at
this stage in order to combat CO2 exclusive catastrophic global warming idea:
but currently hydrocarbon industry is heavily controlled by interlocked
mainstream group that also holds strong stake in environmental industries,
gov't, media, intel, commercial bank etc hence concerted mainstream appeal is
unlikely to occur
• Conventional Cost Green Energy :
to continue to implement unused
fundamentally different/modified concepts - mechanics, Specific niche for:
Time-Location-Positioning-Raw material-Non EM environment needs etc, Once
failed tech or previously reject ed tech should be revisited, examples: -->>cont:
331
linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada