New Water Policy and Practice Volume 1, Number 2 - Spring 2015 | Page 55

New Water Policy and Practice These amendments have also tried to strengthen, the weak structures of CCI, to resolve inter-provincial water conflicts in Pakistan. Despite these arrangements, water disputes between two provinces are still there. Conclusion T his paper has discussed the continuity of water disputes between Punjab and Sindh, since British colonial times. Since then, one of the major reasons for dispute is over reliance on supply-side management of water resources. The situation is same, even today. It is being alleged that through multi-purpose projects, Punjab diverts water or choke off the spigots. There are about 19 barrages and 43 canal systems with 48 off-takes on the IRS in Pakistan, creating world’s largest contiguous man-made system of 61,000 km of canals and 105,000 water courses, irrigating 35 million acres of land (Memon 2002). Three storage reservoirs are also built, at Mangla on River Jehlum, at Tarbella, and at Chashma on river Indus, with total storage capacity of 20 MAF. Additionally, 12 link canals are built to transfer water from western rivers to eastern rivers or to the tributaries of the River Indus (ibid). Such a large number of hydrological projects give little space to natural flow of river. This system was exposed during 2010 flood when barrages like Taunsa, constructed to meet such challenges, failed to stop it (Shah 2011). Even in 2014 when floods occurred in Indian and Pakistan side of Jammu and Kashmir, these structures failed to do so. Instead, they were reasons for 2014 floods. The stake holders have used these structures to divert water in their interests instead of providing a space to the rivers for free flow. The silts have never been cleaned from the canals because it may affect the close-by agricultural lands. As the soil fail to hold on water, even a slight rise of water level leads to flood. To meet this sort of challenge, the feudal control over the canals and decision over it have to be checked by the Pakistani state. Most of the hydrological constructions are cause of disputes between Punjab and Sindh. Kalabagh, in Mianwali district of Punjab bordering Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa is one of the most controversial multi-purpose project in Pakistan. In March 2011, three provincial assemblies—Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and Balochistan—have passed a resolution against its commissioning (Daily Times 2011). Punjab wants not just Kalabagh, but also two more large dams on the Indus, at Bhasha and Skardu/ Katzarah. It feels that the Kalabagh site is the most favourable, compared with the other two, and that it should be built finally (Abbasi and Kazi 2000). The Lahore Chamber of Commerce and Industry has estimated that the dam would produce enough energy to obviate the need to import 20 million barrels of oil (Vaughn et al. 2010). Another controversial multi-purpose project, which has been resolved, in Pakistan was Diamer-Bhasha. Its construction was opposed by Sindh but in 2014, CCI cleared it after breaking the impasse over it. In addition to these projects in August 2000 the federal cabinet of Pakistan approved the Vision-2025 programme to develop its water infrastructure, which has to be implemented in three phases. Priority hydroelectric generations project in phase I includes: Jinnah, Malankhand-III, Allai 54