New Consciousness Review Spring 2016 | Page 22

HEALTH ARTICLE Vaccine Whistleblower By Kevin Barry The following excerpt from “Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC” provides an Executive Summary of four legally recorded phone conversations between Dr. Brian Hooker, a scientist investigating autism and vaccine research, and Dr. William Thompson, a senior scientist in the vaccine safety division at the Centers for Disease Control and prevention (CDC). Thompson is still employed at the CDC under the protection of the federal Whistleblower Protection Act. “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie, deliberate, contrived and dishonest, but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.” —John F. Kennedy A t a town hall meeting in Los Angeles on June 17, 2015, Dr. Brian Hooker revealed that he and Dr. Thompson had spoken on the phone over thirty times. Dr. Hooker legally recorded four of those calls. “. . . Over the period of November 2013 to August 2014, I had over thirty separate phone conversations with Dr. Thompson. He initially reached out to me in an unsolicited phone conversation to my cell phone. Dr. Thompson and I had talked on the phone and exchanged email correspondences much earlier, between 2002 and 2004, back when I was trying to advise the CDC on their vaccine safety studies related to childhood neurodevelopmental disorders. However, 22 | NEW CONSCIOUSNESS REVIEW the CDC curtailed my conversations with him in 2004 due to my family’s participation in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program where we were seeking remuneration for my own son’s vaccine injuries. The phone calls from November 2013 to August 2014 were secret and Thompson did not let CDC officials know that he and I were talking as that could have cost him his employment. I made the decision to record four of the last phone conversations I had with Dr. Thompson, without his knowledge, based on the revelation of harm to children, caused by the CDC’s very dysfunctional and even criminal vaccine safety program. These recordings were obtained legally and involved advice from legal counsel in each instance. . . .”