New Church Life September/October 2017 | Page 49

          at substantive adjectives in both English and Latin. He showed that we must infer meaning from context, not simply from grammar, for there is nothing in the grammar that will tell you the meaning from staring at the forms. Among the responses from seven others where these points: because we should give pause where something could have been expressed more simply but wasn’t, we should be cautious about Derrick’s hypothesis; “Divine Human” and “Human Divine” are adjectival forms of “God-Man” and “Man-God” which God became; context is important to understanding, for the Writings themselves say of certain word-order conventions that they have “sometimes” been observed; ambiguity may lie more in the doctrinal concept than in the grammar. Derrick ended the session with the thought that grammar is part of the context, but that it breaks rules, as well. What Induces People to Leave? After a break, the Rev. Sylvain A. Agnes introduced the Rev. David H. Lindrooth whose paper was called: “Closing the Back Door.” David began by saying that his paper was change-oriented and was offering some approaches we might take toward change. Applying our wonderful ideals can be messy. We see some things not working out for the church and we are called to do things better. There is a power struggle between clergy and laity and we need to hear that people are unhappy. He referred to a book by Josh Packard, PhD and Ashley Hope: Church Refugees: Sociologists reveal why people are DONE with their church but not their faith, and said that it resonated with things he has heard from people who no longer participate in the General Church. He said that we don’t need to abandon our doctrine, but make incremental changes in four areas identified in the book: 1. People are desperate for friendship and community in coming to church, but leave because they experience judgment. 2. People come to the church for conversation and dialogue for developing their own faith but feel that they are served a dogmatic faith that is not closely tied to what the Word says, judging by the complexity of the explanations. 3. The desire for participation is illustrated by the shoes piling up at the doors of these meetings, showing that women want influence in the church. People who want to participate can get tangled in bureaucracy and this discourages participation. 4. Only three of our congregational websites offer service opportunities beyond the congregation. Finding ways to serve with others avoids the pitfall of serving others in a condescending way. Benefactions of charity are useful for leading people into faith. 403