New Church Life Mar/Apr 2015 | Page 41

      churches and attitudes. Many people accepted Swedenborg’s vision of life after death in the 19th century, but a Dominican prior was quoted in 1980: “No reasonable person can hold such a belief any longer.” Emergence from the Depression in the ‘30s, victory in World War II, and the prosperity of the ‘50s encouraged optimism and a feeling “that the General Church was a success.” But now we are in a more skeptical age. The cultural climate of the ‘60s brought new challenges for churches in general, as young people increasingly embraced radical and subversive ideas. But Jeremy said he grew up in the ‘60s hearing how well the Church was doing, with virtually no one criticizing or challenging church leaders. Obviously that has changed. In the ‘80s and ‘90s the need for new strategies became apparent. Jeremy quoted the Rev. Lorentz Soneson in a statement to the Joint Council in 1980: “The Church has come to realize its responsibility for evangelization. The hard fact is, if we don’t increase our membership, the Church will pass out of existence. In the years immediately ahead, this will undoubtedly become a major use of the General Church.” The Rt. Rev. Peter M. Buss said in his response to the Assembly Confirmation Vote for Executive Bishop in 1991: “I dream of a church that will accept without fear, without concern, the call of the Lord to go out and make disciples of all nations. The Heavenly Doctrines are not ours. They are for all people. We have the opportunity to begin as 4,261 adults and their children and their friends to carry this message.” But, Jeremy said, “Evangelization efforts have not been as successful as we have hoped. Predictions of success in evangelization have been consistently frustrated, leading to increasing calls for change, new methods, new vision, new attitudes.” In this same period a decreasing number of Academy graduates are joining the Church. “Issues of equality and social justice, especially surrounding the equal treatment of women and the acceptance of homosexuality lead many, and especially the young, to view the Church as a negative force. Emergence from the Depression in the ‘30s, victory in World War II, and the prosperity of the ‘50s encouraged optimism and a feeling “that the General Church was a success.” But now we are in a more skeptical age. 151