New Church Life July/August 2017 | Page 17

      is why the doctrine of correspondences which discloses the internal sense of the Word could not be revealed until after the Renaissance and the Age of Enlightenment – until certain ideas had been planted and come to fruit in the collective understanding of mankind. When that time had come, the Lord made use of a new prophet, Emanuel Swedenborg. We may observe that people today are a little uncomfortable with the idea of a prophet in modern times, and yet when we look at the way the Bible was constructed, and the testimony of Scripture itself, we see that there have been literally thousands of people during the course of recorded history who have been called by the Lord to be prophets, to have their spiritual senses opened so that they could hear the word of the Lord through an angelic messenger, and then carry it by written or spoken word to others. We should note that the word “angel” is derived from the Greek word for “messenger,” one who carries the Word of God to men. We should not automatically discard the possibility of a modern prophet. The principles of prophecy still apply, and in fact, the scientific and rational nature of the revelation required that the prophet be a modern, educated man so that he could understand the ideas presented to him and then represent them to mankind in a meaningful and clear way. Emanuel Swedenborg was a man whose accomplishments in many fields of science, politics and economics made him uniquely suited to the task of explaining the doctrines of the New Christian Church. His Theological Writings demonstrate that the “spiritual sense” can be systematically, even scientifically, drawn out of Scripture by the use of a system we call the “science of correspondences.” Briefly stated, this doctrine shows that everything in the natural world exists because it corresponds to something in the spiritual world. For example, we say that all the animals in the Word correspond to different affections. Think of the various places in Scripture where animals play a p art in the story, and if we know that good animals represent our good and charitable feelings, while dangerous beasts represent our evil desires, we can begin to see a reason for the parts that the various animals play in the different stories Once we accept the idea that the whole of the Word is a parable that can be understood using a clearly defined set of keys we find that the Word is full of teachings pertinent to our daily life, each level deeper than the next. 287