New Church Life Jan/Feb 2014 | Page 98

new church life: jan uary / february 201 4 reflection of the culture that prevailed in the world around it at that time? It is hard to imagine that any of us is immune to being influenced by the wider culture’s assumptions and opinions, not to mention our own inclinations. But we do have at our disposal the means for considering things more objectively: namely, the doctrines upon which our church was founded. Can we agree that the most important question in any discussion of church policy is: what do the Writings have to say on the subject? If we can agree on that, then we at least have a common ground for resolving conflicts and possibly holding the organization together. (WEO) but do the writings say anything? The Writings have much to say about the nature and use of the priesthood, and they also have much to say about the nature of the masculine and the feminine, and the fact that there are uses appropriate to each. In light of this, how can it be said that the Writings have little or nothing to say about women in the priesthood? For the sake of a comparison, consider that nowhere in the Writings do we find a direct statement that slavery is wrong. But when we consider the whole body of teaching about human life – including how essential human freedom is, and how evil the love of dominion is – the lesson to be drawn from the doctrines regarding slavery is obvious. It certainly was to the New Churchmen who became leaders of the anti-slavery movement. The shortage of explicit statements on a particular subject doesn’t mean the doctrines of the Church have little or nothing to say about it. (WEO) killing jesus Bill O’Reilly emphasizes that Killing Jesus, the number one best-seller he wrote with Martin Dugard, is a book of history, not theology. Indeed, it educates readers about the Roman and religious leaders of the time, along with the culture, events and all the roiling political tensions, without shedding much light on the meaning of it all. But millions of readers are finding that this historical perspective enhances and strengthens their faith, and that’s a positive. As with their previous best-sellers, Killing Lincoln and Killing Kennedy, this book focuses just on historical context – what led to the crucifixion and the days afterwards. As with any recounting of history, it is not perfect, but it does give insight into the moral depravity of the Roman Empire and the corruption among the high priests of the temple. As such, it shows why it was necessary for God to come down on earth to subdue the hells and make Himself visible to us, although the book deliberately does not get into this – leaving that to 94