Neuromag May 2017 | Page 26

Mesa Schumacher Creating a ‘Humanzee’ – science or fiction? Written by Stefanie Schuster Cross-breeding between species has long been reported for horses and donkeys, which gives rise to mules and more recently for tigers and lions (‘Liger’) and bovines and antelopes (‘Beefelo’), but is cross-breeding between great apes such as chimpanzees and humans possible? Is the link between the two species close enough? What actually determines the possibility of cross-breeding? Is it the similarity of DNA between species or the number of chromosomes, or is it rather dependent on evolutionary history? Great apes are obviously different in body posture, strength, communica- tion, behavior and (in most cases, according to human assessment) in- telligence, but more than 95% of their whole DNA sequence is identical to ours, with even 98.8% similarity for their coding DNA (1). This is definitely more than other pairs of species that can produce offspring, like horses and donkeys that have an estimated simi- larity of 94%, so it surely cannot be the answer to the problem. A major factor in determining the pos- A hybrid cross between a male lion and a female tiger: the liger. Source: M. Sullivan (Flickr.com) 26 | NEUROMAG |May 2017 sibility of fertilizing another species’ eggs is the amount of time that has elapsed since the last individual that both species descend from, referred to as the last common ancestor. While the last common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees is often dated back to 13 million years ago, a recent anal- ysis observed more recent gene flow in chromosomes: humans and chim- panzees still had sex and produced offspring until ‘as recent’ as 4 million years ago (2). This is similar to the dat- ing of the last common ancestor of modern horses and donkeys which is dated at 4 to 4.5 million years ago (3). So, it appears that it is more compli- cated than a simple date of last ‘gene distribution’. During my research, I found many people arguing that chimpanzees and humans can surely not produce viable offspring due to the different number of chromosomes, namely 48 chromo- somes for chimpanzees and 46 chro- mosomes for humans. This is simply not true. Again, my example is based on horses and donkeys (but it is also true for bulls and antelopes): they can successfully crossbreed, even though their number of chromosomes is dif- ferent (62 and 64 chromosomes for horses and donkeys, respectively). The offspring with its 63 chromosomes is, however, infertile. Whether this is caused by the uneven number of chro- mosomes as this lonely number 63 cannot pair with another chromosome and segregate correctly or rather by an effect more downstream of pairing, namely the stop of spermatogenesis at a certain point with unknown rea- sons is still under debate. You might say to yourself that this issue of cross-breeding is just a big thought experiment and while we can continue to pontificate until the cows come home we’ll never be able to test it. This type of research is of course precluded for ethical considerations in our current times, but in the 1920s, the Russian biologist Ilya Ivanovich