Network Magazine Autumn 2019 | Page 19

FILEX PRESENTER CEC ARTICLE 1 OF 5 ARTICLES HUMAN METABOLISM AND THE CALORIE CONUNDRUM ‘Energy in minus energy out’ is not as simple as it may seem, with a host of factors affecting both parts of the equation, writes dietitian and sports nutritionist Brian St. Pierre. aining and losing fat changes the way your brain regulates your body weight. To understand this, let’s have a refresher on how human metabolism actually works and explore what that means for your clients, most of whom are probably counting calories. G Energy balance You need a certain amount of energy (in the form of calories) to stay alive, as well as to move around. You can get this energy from food, or you can retrieve it from stored energy, such as your fat tissue. If you consume less energy than you expend, you will lose weight – and if you do the opposite, i.e. consume more energy than you expend, you will gain weight. In other words: Changes in bodily tissues = Energy in - Energy out. This relationship between ‘energy in’ and ‘energy out’ is called the Energy Balance Equation, and it’s the most commonly accepted model for calculating how much weight one will lose or gain over time. ssUnderstandably, people get very frustrated and confused with the Energy Balance Equation when the numbers don’t seem to add up, or their results don’t match their expectations. And it’s a fair frustration. Most of the time, the numbers don’t add up. Expectations versus reality This mismatch between expectations versus reality is not because the Energy Balance Equation is wrong, or a myth. Nobody’s body defies the laws of physics, even though it seems like that sometimes. It’s because the equation is more complicated than it sounds. Many factors affect the Energy Balance Equation. What you do to ‘energy in’ affects what happens to ‘energy out’ and vice versa. The opposing sides aren’t mutually exclusive. ‘Eat less, move more’ is a good start – but that advice alone isn’t enough, because it doesn’t take all of the complex, intersecting factors and feedback loops into account. Let’s take a look at some of these factors, starting with the ‘energy in’ part of the equation. Energy in ‘Energy in’ is trickier than it first sounds, for two main reasons: Reason 1: Inaccurate nutrition labelling It might sound hard to believe, but the number of calories in a meal probably doesn’t match the number of calories/kilojoules on the labels or menu. The way companies, and even the government, come up with energy (kilojoule/calorie) and nutrient estimates is incredibly complex, rather imprecise, and centuries- old. As a result, the Nutrition Information label that’s mandatory THE QUICK READ • The Energy Balance Equation of ‘Energy in - Energy out’ is commonly used for calculating weight loss, or gain, over time • People’s frustrations at failing to lose weight despite following the equation is due in part to inaccurate nutrition information labels, and in part to variations in how much energy we actually absorb and how much energy we use • The factors that affect absorption include how processed the food is; how the food has been prepared or cooked; and our unique gut bacteria • The amount of energy we use is affected by four main factors of resting metabolic rate; thermic effect of eating; physical activity; and non-exercise activity thermogenesis • Altering any one of the variables causes adjustments in other, seemingly unrelated variables. NETWORK AUTUMN 2019 | 19