survival, there is no need for you to have me
as a customer. You would take advantage
of the currency and just deal with it, and
realise that your value is more on creating
something that people want, not the price
for it.
It could be legislated that you have to use
BTC, but how is that going to work if you
all jump ship and use a more democratic
currency, or forget currency altogether and
start looking at your sustainable quality as
a value in itself, not the price for it? What a
total waste of energy; it’s better to incentivize
you to stay in BTC so I can get what I want
at the natural prices things will become by
the natural volume limit of the currency.
In other words, if we didn’t have idiotic
governments increasing and decreasing
the money supply, we’d all be pretty stable
exchanging at certain prices, and just keep
creating quality, irrespective of price. Right?
Because that’s your nature. You want to be
known for being a good person that gives
the best to people. What has money got to
do with that? This argument for BTC is the
same for any crypto, as, even if they are like
Stellar or Ripple that increase volume
available by 1% a year, it just forestalls the
obvious: that the price on your quality is
limiting, and does not diversify cultures,
the latter being natural evolution.
Multiple Complementary/Alternate
Currencies (CoCs/ACs) and Why They
have not Taken Hold
Paul Grigon’s voucher based on abundant
creation is really interesting. The value
is solely based on your energy creating
something. You do nothing, you have no
vouchers, and vice versa. It could even be a
measure of status of how many vouchers
you have in circulation that shows your
value. I do not think that will work; how do
you measure the voucher of someone
making a plane to the other making bread?
We can say that the plane would be made
with a different currency model, but like
the vouchers can become complicated in
themselves to measure against each other,
using project focused currencies just wastes
energy quantifying energy. SO, why, with so
many models out there, have we not taken
hold to evolve our current debt model?