Naturally Kiawah Magazine Volume 42 | Page 21

the plaintiffs have called attention to the fact that each IHA was considered and approved individually, while the impact will be cumulative. Clearly, the combined effects of seismic blasting by five separate entities in the same geographic area for not 108, 308, 70, 208, or 155 days, but 849 days and nights over a one-year period will have a more significant impact on whales, dolphins, sea turtles and the ecosystems that supports them. Another step in the federal approval process for seismic testing involves an applicant’s submission of a request for a “consistency review” to determine whether the proposed activities are consistent with the applicable enforceable policies of an affected state’s Coastal Zone Management Program. In South Carolina, the Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) performs the evaluation. In March of 2019, WesternGeco, one of the five entities that received an IHA from the National Marine Fisheries Service, submitted a Consistency Certification request to DHEC. As part of its review, DHEC published a 30-day public comment period. Over 1,700 individual public comments were received. On July 8, 2019, WesternGeco’s request for a Consistency Certificate was denied. In 2015, DHEC had issued a Conditional Coastal Zone Consistency for essentially the same seismic airgun testing requested by three of the other entities who have received IHAs. 13 However, water transportation of personnel and supplies to rigs.” 9 The expedited permitting process for seismic testing is raising multiple alarms. On November 30, 2018, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) issued five incidental harassment authorizations (“IHAs”), a critical step in granting testing permits to the five geological survey companies. This authorization process is intended to assure compliance with federal law protecting marine mammals, endangered species, and the ecosystems upon which they depend. Federal law does allow for some harassment or “taking” (meaning “to injure, harm, or kill”) of species under limited circumstances. But to be authorized, the harassment must have no more than a “negligible impact” on a species, only impact small numbers, and be based on the best scientific evidence available. 10 Federal law further instructs that actions authorized by the NMFS should not jeopardize the continued existence of protected species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of designated critical habitat. 11 Sixteen coastal municipalities (including Kiawah), the SC Small Business Chamber of Commerce, and South Carolina’s Attorney General are seeking an injunction to stop the five seismic surveys. 12 In addition to stressing that the impact on endangered whales, sea turtles and their ecosystems will be more than “negligible” and that the impact on recreational and commercial fishing will be considerable, WINTER/SPRING 2020 • VOLUME 42 19