My New Black Magazine - NYU Black Renaissance Noire BRN-FALL-206 ISSUE RELEASE | Page 138

BLACK RENAISSANCE NOIRE The history of black American activism in the latter half of the twentieth century underscores the crucial role of media coverage in garnering global support for legal and social change, and in mobilizing politicians and grassroots participation. African American activists, regardless of ideological orientation, sought access to broadcasting and print outlets and hoped to influence the often distorted images of their actions and ideas. Charles Payne’s study of the freedom struggle in Mississippi showed that white journalists consistently ignored the grassroots organizing tradition in black communities, preferring to focus on high-profile leaders and familiar protest narratives. Even an iconic figure like Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. was refused access to numerous communications outlets and constantly fought to have control over how he was represented. Black Power activists and organizations, from Malcolm X, to Stokely Carmichael, to the Black Panther Party faced a generally hostile media that painted them as violent, irrational, and threats to national security. 137 Black Journal was unprecedented — a nationally distributed public television program by, for and about African Americans that beamed into America’s living rooms. Television had the potential to circulate African American social, political and cultural perspectives far beyond the print and oral platforms on which the black public sphere rested. In the hands of a generation of young black cultural workers hungry for opportunities, this arena held out the promise of being the “electronic stimulus for a black revolution,” a proclamation made by Kathleen Cleaver, Communication Secretary of the Black Panther Party. The occasion of Cleaver’s remarks was her appearance on an early episode of Black Journal. Cleaver, a skilled media manipulator in her own right, reflected on the ways broadcasting had become a resource for black social movements during the 1960s. Because of television, “black people are in a position to have instantaneous information about what’s going on and are in a position to react to that,” she explained. Black Journal, largely funded by the Ford Foundation and developed by the National Educational Television network (net), was part of an historical moment that produced “the most daring television the u.s. airwaves had ever seen.” Black Journal opened up opportunities for black media workers and created new approaches for the public discussion of race relations and social justice. In 1969, Ebony magazine pointed to the influence of Black Journal when it declared that public broadcasting was doing the most for African Americans of any dominant cultural institution. Commercial culture of the 1960s — particularly television — was instrumental in the discursive production of a national identity that celebrated whiteness, domesticity, and middle-class aspirations. Indeed, Smith and Carlos’ act of defiance that was broadcast around the world opposed television’s carefully tended narratives of race. “Network television wanted to tell a story of moderate racial progress,” noted Aniko Bodroghkozy in her study of the era’s entertainment programming. To see an African American face on network television was a rarity. When they were rendered visible, it was through a dichotomized lens that posed prime time black entertainers as sanitized and non-threatening, while in the realm of public affairs they appeared militant and dangerous. Network news accounts of African Americans in 1968 were generally confined to a handful of topics beyond King’s assassination — the effect of the “Negro vote” in the upcoming Presidential election (including the Democratic national convention in Chicago); racially-motivated conflicts between blacks and whites, particularly in the South; or resistance and rebellion, ranging from Martin Luther King Jr.’s Poor Peoples campaign to the murder trial of Black Panther Huey Newton. The commercial networks not only positioned black Americans within narrow and mythological frames, they flattened or wholly ignored the breadth of their communities, consciousness and experiences. For example, the news media reduced Rev. King’s quest to build an interracial, cross-class, anti-poverty coalition to just another violent, failed protest movement. “The press pre-empted the class rhetoric and values of the Poor People’s Campaign, and boiled them down to a handful of potent but ultimately misleading symbols,” one scholar found. Similarly, while television networks broadcast more than thirty stories about Huey Newton’s murder trial in the summer of 1968, the Black Panthers were presented as a vaguely threatening and glamorous group, elevating Newton to celebrity status with no serious attention to the group’s political claims or constituencies.