My first Magazine | Page 81

A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE LOCAL RISK-FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ETIOLOGY OF PERI-IMPLANT DISEASES independent of the time of implant loading and surface characteristics 82. In a histomorphometric study, Elian et al. 83 compared the effects of two interimplant distances( 2 mm and 3 mm) on bone maintenance with bone level implants. The results showed that the interproximal bone loss measured from the edge of the implant platform to the bone crest was not different for interimplant distances of 2 mm or 3 mm. Moreover, according to Tarnow et al. 81, an interimplant distance of greater than 3 millimeters( mm) between two adjacent implants helps preserve the interproximal bone peak and results in an average bone resorption of 0.45 mm up to 3 years of follow up. However, under circumstances where the distance between the implants is less than or equal to 3 mm, the average resorption of the interproximal bone peak increases to 1.04 mm, which in turn compromises support for the interimplant papilla 81. Results by Tarnow et al. 81 also demonstrated that when the distance from the base of the contact point to the crest of bone was 3mm, 4mm or 5 mm, the papilla was present almost 100 % of the time; however, when the distance was 7mm, 8mm, 9mm, or 10 mm, the papilla was mostly missing. To the author’ s knowledge from indexed literature, the influence of interimplant distance on crestal bone loss around dental implants remains unclear. 3.9. Surgical skills and experience of operator Surgical trauma and / or limited clinical experience
REFERENCES have been considered as one of the most essential factors associated with the etiology of peri-implant diseases 84, 85. It has been reported that peri-implant disease are more often manifested among authors who have placed less than 50 dental implants as compared to those who have placed more than 50 implants 86, 87. Moreover, overheating of bone during implant placement procedures may result in osteonecrosis thereby inviting peri-implant diseases and even implant failure 88.
4. Recommendations It is highly recommended that oral healthcare providers practicing implant dentistry should be aware of the risk factors associated with periimpalnt diseases. Adequate knowledge of such risk-factors may also be useful in selecting patients for future implant therapy. Simultaneously, it is imperative for healthcare providers to educate their patients( including those who have either received dental implants or those that are potential candidates for future dental implant therapy) about the detrimental effects of these risk-factors on the long-term success and survival of dental implants.
Conflict of interest and financial disclosure The author reports no conflict of interest and there was no external source of funding for the present study.
1. Romanos GE, Javed F, Delgado-Ruiz RA, Calvo-Guirado JL. Periimplant diseases: a review of treatment interventions. Dent Clin North Am. 2015; 59( 1): 157-178. 2. Lombardo G, Pardo A, Mascellaro A, Corrocher G, Marincola M, Costantinescu FE, Nocini PF. Rehabilitation of severely resorbed maxillae with zygomatic implants: a literature review. Stoma Edu J. 2015; 2( 1): 69-78. 3. Fenner N, Hammerle CH, Sailer I, Jung RE. Long-term clinical, technical, and esthetic outcomes of all-ceramic vs. titanium abutments on implant supporting single-tooth reconstructions after at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27( 6): 716-723. 4. Jeong MA, Jung MK, Kim SG, Oh JS. Implant Stability Measurements in the Long-Term Follow-up of Dentis Implants: A Retrospective Study With Periotest. Implant Dent. 2015; 24( 3): 263-266. 5. Tonetti MS. Risk factors for osseodisintegration. Periodontology 2000. 1998; 17:55-62. 6. Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T. Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35( 8 Suppl): 286-291. 7. Khammissa RA, Feller L, Meyerov R, Lemmer J. Peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: clinical and histopathological characteristics and treatment. SADJ 2012; 67( 3): 122, 4-6. 8. Jankovic S, Aleksic Z, Dimitrijevic B, Lekovic V, Camargo P, Kenney B. Prevalence of human cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus in subgingival plaque at peri-implantitis, mucositis and healthy sites. A pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 40( 3): 271-276. 9. Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E, Jr., Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1987; 2( 4): 145-151. 10. Koldsland OC, Scheie AA, Aass AM. Prevalence of peri-implantitis related to severity of the disease with different degrees of bone loss. J Periodontol. 2010; 81( 2): 231-8. 11. Mombelli A, Muller N, Cionca N. The epidemiology of peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23 Suppl 6:67-76. 12. Tsigarida AA, Dabdoub SM, Nagaraja HN, Kumar PS. The Influence of Smoking on the Peri-Implant Microbiome. J Dent Res. 2015; 94( 9): 1202-1217. 13. Ferreira SD, Silva GL, Cortelli JR, Costa JE, Costa FO. Prevalence and risk variables for peri-implant disease in Brazilian subjects. J Clin Periodontol. 2006; 33( 12): 929-935. 14. Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. 10-year prospective cohort followup of immediately restored XiVE implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27( 6): 694-700. 15. Miyata T, Kobayashi Y, Araki H, Ohto T, Shin K. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. Part 3: A histologic study in monkeys. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000; 15( 3): 425-431. 16. Wahlstrom M, Sagulin GB, Jansson LE. Clinical follow-up of unilateral, fixed dental prosthesis on maxillary implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21( 11): 1294-300. 17. Lindhe J, Berglundh T, Ericsson I, Liljenberg B, Marinello C. Experimental breakdown of peri-implant and periodontal tissues. A study in the beagle dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992; 3( 1): 9-16. 18. Javed F, Al-Hezaimi K, Salameh Z, Almas K, Romanos GE. Proinflammatory cytokines in the crevicular fluid of patients with peri-implantitis. Cytokine. 2011; 53( 1): 8-12. 19. Belibasakis GN. Microbiological and immuno-pathological aspects of peri-implant diseases. Arch Oral Biol. 2014; 59( 1): 66-72. 20. Vohra F, Al-Rifaiy MQ, Almas K, Javed F. Efficacy of systemic bisphosphonate delivery on osseointegration of implants under osteoporotic conditions: lessons from animal studies. Arch Oral Biol. 2014; 59( 9): 912-920. 21. Javed F, Almas K. Osseointegration of dental implants in patients undergoing bisphosphonate treatment: a literature review. J Periodontol. 2010; 81( 4): 479-484. 22. Javed F, Romanos GE. Impact of diabetes mellitus and glycemic control on the osseointegration of dental implants: a systematic literature review. J Periodontol. 2009; 80( 11): 1719-1730. 23. Javed F, Al-Hezaimi K, Al-Rasheed A, Almas K, Romanos GE. Implant survival rate after oral cancer therapy: a review. Oral Oncol. 2010; 46( 12): 854-859. 24. Lu SY, Huang CC. Resolution of an active peri-implantitis in a chronic steroid user by bone augmentation with PepGen P-15 and a barrier membrane. J Oral Implantol. 2007; 33( 5): 280-287. 25. Duyck J, Naert I. Failure of oral implants: aetiology, symptoms and influencing factors. Clin Oral Investig. 1998; 2( 3): 102-114. 26. Hutton JE, Heath MR, Chai JY, Harnett J, Jemt T, Johns RB, et al. Factors related to success and failure rates at 3-year follow-up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995; 10( 1): 33-42. 27. Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, Heath MR, Hutton JE, Johns RB, et al. A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by

197