IN VITRO WEAR OF 4 DIFFERENT UNIVERSAL COMPOSITES
9. DeLong R. Intra-oral restorative materials wear: rethinking the current approaches: how to measure wear. Dent Mater. 2006 Aug; 22( 8): 702-711. 10. Ferracane JL. Resin composite – State of the art. Dent Mater. 2011; 27( 1): 29-38. 11. Da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Donassollo TA, Cenci MS, Loguércio AD, Moraes RR, Bronkhorst EM, Opdam NJ, Demarco FF. 22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dent Mater. 2011; 27( 10): 955-963. 12. Krämer N, Reinelt C, Frankenberger R. Ten year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2015; 17( 5): 433-441. 13. Lempel E, TóA, Fábián T, Krajczár K, Szalama J. Retrospective evaluation of posterior direct restorations: 10 year findings. Dent Mater. 2015; 31( 2): 115-122. 14. van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. A randomized 10-year prospective follow-up of Class II nanohybrid and conventional hybrid resin composite restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2014; 16( 6): 585- 592. 15. Pallesen U, van Dijken JWV. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations. Dent Mater. 2015; 31( 10): 1232-1244. 16. Planiappan S, Elsen L, Lijnen I, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance, quantitative and qualitative wear patterns of hybrid composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 2010; 14( 4): 441-458. 17. Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Krämer N. Nanohybrif vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: 8-year results. Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 18( 1): 125-37. 18. De Gee AJ, Pallav P, Davidson CL. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress bearing composites and amalgam in vitro. J Dent Res. 1986; 65( 5): 654-658. 19. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dent Mater. 1996; 12( 4): 218-226. 20. Leinfelder KF, Beaudreau RW, Mazer RB. An in vitro device for predicting clinical wear. Quintessence Int. 1989; 20( 10): 755- 761. 21. Han JM, Zhang H, Choe HS, Lin H, Zheng G, Hong G. Abrasive wear and surface roughness of contemporary dental composite resin. Dent Mater J. 2014; 33( 6): 725-732. 22. Al Khuraif AA. An in vitro evaluation of wear and surface roughness of particulate filler composite resin after tooth brushing. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014; 72( 8): 977-983. 23. Aker JR. New composite resins: comparison of their resistance to tooth brush abrasion and characteristics of abraded surfaces. J Am Dent Assoc. 1982; 105( 4): 633-635. 24. Osiewicz MA, Werner A, Pytko-Polonczyk, Roeters FJM, Kleverlaan CJ. Contact and contact free wear between various resin composites. Dent Mater. 2015; 31( 2): 134-140.
25. Winkler MM, Greener EH, Lautenschlager EP. Non-linear in vitro wear of posterior composites with time. Dent Mater. 1991; 7( 4): 258-262. 26. Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112( 5): 1141-1150. 27. Wang R, Bao S, Liu F, Jiang X, Zhang Q, Sun B, Zhu M. Wear behavior of light-cured resin composites with bimodal silica nanostructures as fillers. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013; 33( 8): 4759-4766. 28. Kai M, Satou J, Satou N, Shintani H, Fujioka M. Sliding wear of various composite resins and bovine enamel. Dent Mater J. 1986; 5( 2): 165-171. 29. Kunzelmann KH. Verschleissanalyse und – quantifizierung von Füllungsmaterialien in vivo und in vitro. Aachen: Shaker Verlag; 1998. 30. DeLong R, Douglas WH. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force movement control. J Dent Res. 1983; 62( 1): 32-36. 31. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F Albertoni M. [ An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computercontrolled mastication simulator ]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990; 100( 8): 953-960. 32. Hao Z, Yin H, Wang L, Meng Y. Wear behavior of seven Artificial resin teeth assessed with three-dimensional measurements. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112( 6): 1507-1512. 33. Koottathhape N, Takahashi H, Iwaqsaki N, Kanehira M, Finger WJ. Quantitative wear and wear damage analysis of composite resin in vitro. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014; 29:508-516. 34. Heintze SD. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater. 2006; 22( 8): 712-734. 35. Gibbis CH, Mahan PE, Lundeen HC, Brehnan K, Walsh EK, Holbrook WB. Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 46( 4): 443-449. 36. D’ Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Rondoni GD, Pirani M, Vadini M, Gattone M, De Angelis F. Wear properties of a novel resin composite compared to human enamel and other restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2014; 39( 6): 612-618. 37. Mehl C, Scheibner S, Ludwig K, Kern M. Wear of composite resin veneering materials and enamel in a chewing simulator. Dent Mater. 2007; 23( 11): 1382-1389. 38. Lazaridou D, Belli R, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. Are resin composites suitable replacements for amalgam? A study of twobody wear. Clin Oral Investig. 2015; 19( 6): 1485-1492. 39. Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials. Dent Mater. 2006; 22( 11): 1051-1062. 40. Zantner C, Kielbassa AM, Martus P, Kunzelmann KH. Sliding wear of 19 commercially available composites and compomers. Dent Mater. 2004; 20( 3): 277-285.
45