DIRECT VENEERS- FROM DESIGN TO IMPLEMENTATION
REFERENCES
1. Rosenstiel SF, Rashid RG. Public preferences for anterior tooth variations: a web-based study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2002; 14( 2): 97-106. 2. Paolucci B, Calamita M, Coachman C, Gürel G, Shayder A, Hallawell P. Visagism: the art of dental composition. Quintessence Dent Technol. 2012; 35:187 – 200. 3. Maier B. Aesthetic guidelines for natural-looking dentures. Cosmetic Dentistry 2011; 4:14-17. 4. LeSage BP, Dalloca L. Approaches to smile design. Mathematical to artistic interpretation. J Cosmet Dent. 2012; 28( 1): 127- 147. 5. Dietschi D. Free-hand composite resin restorations: a key to anterior aesthetics. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1995; 7( 7): 15-25; quiz 27. 6. Ahmad I. Protocols for predictable aesthetic dental restorations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2006 7. Villarroel M, Fahl N, De Sousa AM, De Oliveira OB Jr. Direct esthetic restorations based on translucency and opacity of composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011; 23( 2): 73- 87. 8. Azzopardi N, Moharamzadeh K, Wood DJ, Martin N, van Noort R. Effect of resin matrix composition on the translucency of experimental dental composite resins. Dent Mater. 2009; 25( 12): 1564-1568.
9. Ahmad I. Crafted Restorations- Shade matching with resin based composites. J Cosmet Dent. 2013; 29( 1): 43-50. 10. Milnar J, Wohlberg J. Direct Resin Veneers. J Cosmet Dent. 2013; 29( 1): 110-111. 11. Barakah HM, Taher NM. Effect of Polishing systems on stain susceptibility and surface roughness of nanocomposite resin material. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112( 3): 625-631. 12. Peyton JH. Finishing and polishing techniques: direct composite resin restorations. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2004; 16( 4): 293-298; quiz 300. 13. Scoble HO, White SN. Compound complex curves: the authentic geometry of esthetic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 111( 6): 448-454. 14. Gürel G, The science and art of porcelain laminate veneers. Berlin, Germany: Quintessence Pub; 2003. p 87. 15. Frese C, Schiller P, Staehle HJ, Wolff D. Recontouring teeth and closing diastemas with direct composite buildups: a 5-year follow-up. J Dent. 2013; 41( 11): 979-985. 16. Garcia-Godoy F, Krämer N, Feilzer AJ, Frankenberger R. Long-term degradation of enamel and dentin bonds: 6-year results in vitro vs. in vivo. Dent Mater. 2010; 26( 11): 1113-1118. 17. Gresnigt MM, Kalk W, Ozcan M. Randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial of direct laminate veneers with two micro-hybrid resin composites. J Dent. 2012; 40( 9): 766-775.
CV
In which case can you choose direct veneers?
q a. Hypocalcification; q b. Abrasion; q c. Missing teeth; q d. Disathema closure.
It’ s typical of a young frontal teeth:
q a. HALO effect; q b. Visible perikymata; q c. Surface grooves; q d. Mamelons.
A direct restoration is needed to q a. Diagnostic waxwork;
q b. Porcelain layering; q c. Intraoral mock-up; q d. Composite layering.
Zoltán MISKOLCZY
DMD, clinical dentist Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry
Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
Dr. Zoltán Miskolczy graduated from the Faculty of Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary in 2012. Later on he started working for the Department of Prosthodontics. He has always focused on aesthetic dentistry especially on the direct and indirect veneers so as to constantly enhance his knowledge and learn new techniques.
Questions
The step of direct veneer implementation:
q a. Teeth preparation; q b. Precision Impression; q c. Conditioned the surface by means of total etch technology( 37 % orthophosphoric acid); q d. Composite layering.
38 STOMA. EDUJ( 2016) 3( 1)