My first Magazine Sky & Telescope - 02.2019 | Page 22
Cosmic Reveries
Infl ation scenario
Bounce scenario
?
Inflationary expansion
Current expansion
Slow contraction
Bounce
Current expansion
ingly common outcome of elementary particle theories. In
Linde’s theory of chaotic infl ation, patches of infl ating space
can emerge from an existing universe — one that’s much less
orderly than our universe, a sort of hodgepodge of regions
dense and sparse.
Bouncing Universes to Baby Universes
Despite such radical variations on the theme, infl ation
remains the mainstream view in cosmology. It fi ts with new
observational evidence, much of it from that same leftover
radiation that helped confi rm the original Big Bang theory.
Over recent decades, scientists have studied this cosmic
microwave background in ever-fi ner detail from ground-based
detectors and from the perch of a series of increasingly com-
plex satellites.
According to the theory, if infl ation happened, then tiny
density bumps in the early universe — inevitable thanks to
the laws of quantum mechanics — would have grown large
during the growth spurt and left an imprint of hot and cold
spots in the cosmic microwave background. That imprint
would survive as infl ation ended and the hot Big Bang
started, with the denser regions seeding the formation of
galaxies. So far, observations show a pattern of hot and cold
spots that matches those predictions.
Still, other theorists found that they could explain these
same observations with a very different scenario — a series
20
FE B RUA RY 2 019 • SK Y & TELESCOPE
of “bouncing” phases of contraction and expansion. Back in
2001, a collaboration of physicists and cosmologists proposed
such a scenario in which the Big Bang was really a collision
of two existing universes fl oating in a higher-dimensional
space. The idea took the notion of higher dimensions from
string theory, which predicts the existence of 11 dimensions
— seven spatial ones beyond our familiar three of space and
one of time. While string theory posits that the extra dimen-
sions are curled up in a way that makes them impossible to
observe, some physicists have proposed that one or more of
these dimensions stretch out, so that our universe might fl oat
within a higher-dimensional space the way a sheet of paper
might fl oat through a three-dimensional room.
One of the inventors of this scenario, Paul Steinhardt
(Princeton University), says that in the past decade he and
his collaborators have streamlined the bouncing universe idea
so that they no longer need the collision or the extra dimen-
sions. All that’s required is an existing universe, which con-
tracts slowly until it “bounces” and starts expanding. This, he
says, could happen once or in cycles.
The contraction of an existing universe can solve all the
puzzles that infl ation fi xes, Steinhardt argues. It smooths
out variations and gives rise to the same large-scale unifor-
mity and cosmic structure, all without requiring any more
assumptions than infl ation does. The cause of the contraction
isn’t well understood, but neither is the cause of infl ation.
And the bouncing scenario has the advantage of not predict-
ing an infi nite number of universes, he adds.
Caltech’s Sean Carroll favors another possible prequel to
the Big Bang. He came to thinking about the origin of the
universe while trying to answer a question about everyday
life: Why do we have an apparent arrow of time? The laws of
physics are symmetrical forwards and backwards, and yet, we
can stir cream into coffee and scramble eggs, but can’t un-stir
or unscramble them. Time streams along indifferently into
the future, toward disorder, death, and decay.
As Carroll explains in his 2010 book, From Eternity to
Here, scientists of the 1800s fi nally made some serious
headway on this ancient problem when they discovered the
second law of thermodynamics. A property called entropy,
which is something like disorder, increases relentlessly and
p INFLATION OR BOUNCE? To explain why the observable universe is geometrically fl at and its contents well mixed, astronomers think it began
almost infi nitely compact, then grew in a brief, exponential spurt called infl ation before continuing to expand more slowly. However, it’s unclear what
came before infl ation. One alternative idea is that instead of infl ating, the universe existed earlier in a contracting state, then bounced.