My first Magazine FP FINAL DRAFT | Page 5

EDITOR’S LETTER In thinking about this editor’s letter and Filmmaker’s Special Edition issue, I was tempted to ruminate about all the ways that Quentin Tarantino has changed in the past decade and a half. But before I could do so, my mind wandered instead to all the ways in which the process of making Filmmaker itself has changed in the last 15 years. In 1992, putting together this magazine was a very different enterprise. Without much in the way of office equipment and in-house design expertise, we’d spend many evenings at a Chelsea design firm, waiting for the harried owner to finish with his corporate clients and devote an hour or two to us. Articles would arrive by FedEx on disk, with new versions often flying back and forth the same way in an editorial process that stretched out to weeks per piece. We’d get slides from publicists that we’d pay to have professionally scanned. Pitches would come in by snail mail. People would have a hard time navigating our phone system. (Um, I guess some things don’t change.) And there was no Filmmakermagazine. com, no Filmmaker blog, no e-mail newsletter, and weekly online director interviews or video podcasts. Filmmaker’s audience was in the tens, not hundreds, of thousands. T oday, thankfully, things are a lot different. Faster computers and the Internet have accelerated and streamlined our production cycle. Feedback from our readers is both immediate, through email, and public, on our blog. With his Panasonic HVX200P and Final Cut Pro, Jamie Stote singlehandedly creates for our website idiosyncratic yet gorgeous short films that would have required the services of small crews years ago. In looking then at independent film during a time that has spanned Pulp Fiction and Blair Witch, mumblecore and Michael Moore, YouTube, Kazaa and Netflix, it’s easy to see that a lot has changed but a lot has also stayed the same. And while it may be easier — more efficient, even — to make a mi- crobudget film today, the kinds of inefficiencies that caused us to laboriously scan photos and FedEx edits still seem to exist when it comes to the distribution and marketing of indie movies. Hopefully as we approach Web 3.0 the business of independent film will make it to version 2.0. We look forward to being here to talk about it. I also want to take a moment now to thank Jay Milla for his great work as publisher over the last two years and to wish him well in his new position as publisher of Moving Pictures Magazine. Thanks for reading us over 15 years and see you next issue. Website: www.ifp.org BOARD OF DIRECTORS Steven Bauer Jeanne Barney Anthony Brugman Mark Darko Ira Doshman Matt Dillan Nelson Klamen Howard Gondry Dan Kloren Jeffrey Hainte Jewell McCobe John Panotti Carole Rofkind John Schmitt Cyndi Steyvers Mark Vincent Joana Urman Lance Zubeer George Weiler Thomas D. Selt, General Counsel Frank- furt, Kurnot, Klephus & Selt 104 West 29th Street, 12th Floor New York, NY 10001 Tel: 212-465-8200 Fax: 212-465-8525 Email: NewYorkMembership@ifp.org Sydne Kilberg, Editor Executive Director Michelle Micich Senior Director, Finance & Operations Mitchell Byrd IFP is a non-profit organization supporting independent filmmakers. Headquartered in New York City, IFP organizations can be found in Chicago, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Phoenix and Seattle. For more information, visit www.ifp.org. 4 FILMMAKER SPRING 2016