Muscle Evolution Muscle_Evolution_-_December_2014 | Page 28

M.E SCIENCE By Devlin Brown, Editor MUSCLE SHOWDOWN: GENES VS HARD WORK HOW FAR CAN BLOOD, SWEAT AND TEARS TAKE YOU? W E HAVE ALL SEEN THE YOUTUBE VIDEOS WHERE THE GUY SHOUTS ABOUT HARD WORK BEATING TALENT WHEN TALENT DOESN’T WORK HARD, about wanting it more than we want to breathe, and we get pumped up and run through walls with enough rage to tear down an empire as we try and bend the iron and shatter the gym floor. Work hard, push yourself, never give up, one more rep! How far can this get us if we do not have the genetics of the stars? After all Phil Heath is not called The Gift for nothing. HARD WORK VERSUS TALENT A nyone who has seen Generation Iron will remember Kai Greene talking about how he works so hard, and with his hard work he will take on Heath with all his gifts. This rivalry has been pitted as the hard work versus talent argument. The top two bodybuilders in the world going head to head and the one with talent coming out tops. To be fair, this is not entirely true. To portray Phil Heath as someone with abundant talent and having success served on a plate is simplistic and just wrong. You do not win the Olympia four times in a row by coasting on genetic superiority. Make no mistake about it, he works hard, he works very, very hard. However, where his genetics shine is when his lines and muscle bellies turn into the works of art that they are. That is genetics. Kai Greene is also, obviously, blessed with the talent to make him the number two bodybuilder in the world. We are not talking about an untalented guy here. We are talking about a phenomenal bodybuilder. But for all his amazing size and proportions, Greene lost to Phil more than once because on the eye, even to a first-time observer, Heath has just got it. What is it? D r Rob Collins from the Centre for Sports Medicine and Orthopaedics in Rosebank, Johannesburg and Senior Team Physician for the Golden Lions Rugby Union says that there are three categories of potential athlete. “Athletic performance and ability is obviously a combination of nurture and nature. I believe that there would have to be three groups of athletes depending on their nature and nurture abilities.” 1. Those with supreme natural ability who work extremely hard. 2. Those who are naturally good and work average as well as those who are naturally average but work hard. 3. Those who are untalented and don’t train. “I suppose the same would apply to any area of life, not necessarily just sport – no matter how hard the kid with a low IQ works, he will never win a Nobel prize for maths. Similarly, to be a world-class athlete, one needs extreme natural gifts which one then has to work on and hone,” explains Dr Collins. It is clear that nature and nurture both play a pivotal role in an athlete’s eventual success. But in order to be elite he needs to have abundant natural talent first. The discussion then leads to the interplay between nature and nurture and how they influence each other and work together to be able to produce a star athlete. “To be a world-class athlete, one needs extreme natural gifts which one then has to work on and hone.” 26 Muscle Evolution TO