Municipal Monitor Q3 2017 | Page 12

Big-Box Assessment Appeals Are A Study In Unfairness By Cynthia Townsend Re: “Why Northern Municipalities Struggle with Canadian Tire Reassessment Bills,” Municipal Monitor, Q2. I t was with great anticipation that I read Johnnie Bachusky’s article in the last issue of the Municipal Monitor. For us, this is nothing new. Espanola and Dryden were almost fa- mous when the Assessment Review Board (ARB) sided with the pulp and paper industry in 2013, resulting in retroactive amounts due of approxi- mately 70 per cent of our annual levy and an ongoing decrease in taxation revenue of approximately 15 per cent. We too have been subjected to the Canadian Tire appeals, which have seen a 50 per cent reduction in value between the original 2012 returned value by the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC) and the new 2016 value. MPAC has three main approaches to value: 1) the com- parable sales approach; 2) the income approach; and 3) the cost approach. Big-box stores argue that there are no sales of similar stores for which to apply this approach and MPAC 10 Q3 2017  www.amcto.com accepts this. These big-box stores flip-flop on a cost versus income approach, based upon whatever value is lower, and therefore they mini- mize the amount of taxes due to the municipality.  Canadian Tire is a very interesting example. Most of their stores are included in a real estate investment trust, yet for MPAC’s valu- ation purposes the income approach isn’t valid — irony at its best. So the approach that is generally accepted is the cost basis, where accelerated amortization rates are the norm based upon sales of properties. Remember that sales were not satisfactory for a valuation approach; however, sales of defunct stores with restrictive covenants can be used to argue for accelerated amortization. The role of the municipal working group should also be of par- ticular interest to municipalities. Other parties consider the accep- tance by this group to reflect all of the “ MPAC needs to work harder at returning values that municipalities can rely upon. Continued on Page 12