FRACTAL ANALYSIS OF SOME RESTORATIVE NANO-FILLED COMPOSITE MATERIALS
MICROSTRUCTURE
Bibliography
1. Ure D, Harris J. Nanotechnology in
dentistry: Reduction to practice. Dent Update.
2003;30(1):10-15.
2. Bayne SC. Dental biomaterials: Where are we
and where are we going? J Dent Educ. 2005;69(5):
571-585.
3. Terry DA. Direct applications of a nanocomposite
resin system: part 1- the evolution of contemporary
composite materials. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent.
2004;16(6): 417-422.
4. Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup
G. Characterization of nanofilled compared to
universal and microfilld composites. Dent Mater.
2007; 23(1): 51-59.
5. Kim KH, Ong JL, Okuno O. The effect of filler
loading and morphology on the mechanical
properties of contemporary composites. J Prosthet
Dent. 2002;87(6):642-649.
6. Zhang X, Kolb B, Hanggi D, Craig B. Dental
material with nano-sized silica particles. WO
01/30307 A1, 3M, 2001.
7. Mandelbrot BB. Fractals Form, Change and
Dimension. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and
Company; 1977.
8. Mandelbrot BB. The Fractal Geometry of Nature.
San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1982.
9. 3M DENTAL PRODUCTS LABORATORY,
Filtek Supreme XT: Technical Product Profile;
U.S.A. 2005.
10. 3M DENTAL PRODUCTS LABORATORY, Filtek
Ultimate Universal Restorative System: Technical
Product Profile; U.S.A. 2010.
1 ΔΉ-