Modern Model January 2014 | Page 13

The  S.gma  of  Glamour     By  Brian  Thornton       When   it   comes   to   the   glamour   side   of   modeling,  including  categories  such  as  boudoir,  glamour,   and   lingerie,   the   nega.ve   labels   begin   to   fly   almost   immediately.   The   photos   are   labeled   as   too   risky   or   revealing.     Glamour   photos   posted   on   social   media   networks  are  met  with  chas.sing  messages  from  friends   and   rela.ves,   or   inappropriate   remarks,   sugges.ons,   or   unsolicited  rela.onship  offers.     The   s.gma   of   glamour   remains   one   of   American  society’s  greatest  mixed  messages  to  women,   who   are   expected   to   be   beau.ful,   but   not   express   the   beauty  publicly     It   is   harder   to   define   glamour   when   some   ar.s.c  routes  moves  away  from  basic  concepts  to  more   ar.s.c   forms,   but   for   the   sake   of   this   argument,   I   will   focus   on   some   of   the   more   mainstream   approaches   to   glamour,   understanding   that   even   these   images   are   deemed  socially  unacceptable.     Studio   M,   through   their   Exquisite   series   of   glamour   photography   services,   is   showcased   as   an   example   of   a   studio   that   consistently   produces   high   quality  images  of  models  in  glamorous  ouuits  and  poses   that   captures   both   the   inner   and   outer   beauty   of   the   models  involved,  and  clearly  demonstrates  why  it  is  .me   to   move   beyond   any   nega.ve   opinions   of   glamour   photography.   Similar   to   the   cover   photo   if   this   edi.on,   some   fail   to   realize   that   a   model   posing   in   lingerie   is   usually   covered   more   than   a   model   posing   in   a   string   bikini   or   micro-­‐bikini,   which   has   become   socially   acceptable.    It  is  also  important  to  note  that  those  who  are   provoked  by  images  of  glamour  are  confusing  the  ar.s.c   composi.on  of  the  photo  with  their  personal  feelings  or   reac.ons   to   the   images   –   demanding   the   removal   of   public   display   for   these   images   makes   about   as   much   sense   as   someone   demanding   that   restaurants   not   display  images  of  apple  pie  because  they  simple  do  not   like  the  way  apple  pie  looks.    It  is  .me  for  the  collec.ve  conscience  to  revisit   the   issue   of   glamour   photography,   and   try   to   form   a   more  educa.on  and  appropriate  censes  of  the  fact  that   these  images  merely  highlight  the  subject’s  beauty,  and   stop  trying  to  raise  issues  beyond  that.       Top  banner  photo,  Model  BriZany  Jackson;  right