Mobile:Engaged compendium Mobile:Engaged compendium | Page 27

Getting help with evaluation Rather than try to recreate some of the handy resources that there are ‘out there’, or to try and second-guess every reader’s needs, we’ve included some examples of evaluation guides and encourage you to engage with them. We’ve also reflected on the evaluation challenges of each case study project throughout the volume. Sometimes, you might find that you have the resources to commission an external evaluation of your work. This can appeal for a number of reasons, not least because you might like to hand over the whole process to someone else, but independence can also give extra credibility. Given how invested we are in our projects it might be hard to stay really detached and objective. Plus, other people do this for a living! Even if you are not planning to do an evaluation yourself, it can be useful to read a little around different types of evaluation to get an idea of the ‘type’ that you want. For example, if you are interested in levels of offending, you may be interested in a ‘quantitative’ project, involving a method such as a questionnaire, that assesses self-reported offending with large groups of people both before and after experiencing an intervention, or you may require an observation project that involves observing the number of offenders who can be seen using a mobile phone while driving on a given road. If you are interested in understanding why behaviours have changed or how your target demographic group believe your road safety strategy could be improved, ‘qualitative’ approaches including interviews or focus groups would be better suited as they provide more depth of understanding. We would encourage you to really make sure that anyone who comes in to evaluate your project really understands what you require, and understands the practicalities of what is being delivered, so that they can design an evaluation that is realistic and achievable and answers your questions. Toolkits such as E-valu-it¹ can be usefully combined with more specific guidance². Information on evaluation more generally can also be useful; The Dorset County Council guide³, for example, is a simple and easy-to- navigate toolkit. Even if you don’t plan on becoming an expert evaluator yourself, everything you do learn can help you get value for money from someone else. ¹ RoSPA (nd). E-valu-it Logic Model. Available from: http://www.roadsafetyevaluation.com/introduction/logicmodel ² Helman, S., Ward, H.A., Christie, N., & McKenna, F.P (2011) Using behavioural measures to evaluate route safety schemes: detailed guidance for practitioner. Available from http://www.roadsafetyevaluation.com/docs/behavioural-measures.pdf ³ Dorset County Council (nd). Evaluation Toolkit. Available from: http://www.roadsafetyevaluation.com/docs/evaluation-toolkit.pdf 27