Military Review English Edition May-June 2016 | Page 67

COUNTERPROPAGANDA of twenty thousand foreigners from over eighty countries responding to IS propaganda recruiting efforts.15 Clearly, counterpropaganda concepts should be addressed more thoroughly, and the Joint Staff should incorporate the guidance found in FM 3-05.301 into joint doctrinal publications (see figure on page 66). Analyzing Propaganda Though obsolete, FM 3-05.301 provides a proven approach in analyzing propaganda. Propaganda analysis is a complex process that requires historical research, examination of propaganda messages and media, and critical scrutiny of the entire propaganda procedure. While propaganda analysis is primarily done to gather (Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons) Australian World War I-era propaganda cartoon by Norman Lindsay, circa 1918. Allied propaganda sought to adversely shape international perceptions regarding German soldiers as well as undermine German domestic morale. German soldiers and their leaders were relentlessly depicted as brutish and uncivilized savages bent on conquering the world. (Image courtesy of Worldwar1postcards.com) A World War I propaganda postcard depicts the exe cution of Edith Cavell, a British nurse working in Belgium during the German occupation who helped more than two hundred Allied soldiers to escape. Arrested and executed for treason by German occupation forces in 1915, her death was exploited extensively by British propagandists to portray German forces as murderers of innocent women. information to develop future IO programs, it can uncover intelligence for other uses: errors of fact that suggest a weakness in the adversary’s intelligence-gathering assets, indications the adversary is attempting to prepare public opinion for a particular eventuality, issues on which the adversary displays exceptional MILITARY REVIEW  May-June 2016 sensitivity, and successful military operations that require propaganda reaction from the adversary.16 Previously, FM 3-05.301 was the Army’s doctrinal reference for analyzing adversarial propaganda. Its approach is still sound. IO cells have used its source-content-audience-media-effects model to effectively analyze adversarial propaganda activities. Source. A source is the origin or sponsor of the propaganda.17 It may be an individual, government, organization, or combination thereof. Identifying the source of the propaganda provides information concerning the purpose of the propaganda. According to Garth Jowett and Victoria O’Donnell, “Propaganda that conceals its source has a larger purpose than what is readily discernible.”18 For example, the Soviet Union often used left-wing front groups resident in many nations during the Cold War to disseminate its propaganda messages 65