Military Review English Edition May-June 2016 | Page 10
Old Generation
Warfare
The Evolution—
Not Revolution—of
the Russian Way of
Warfare
Maj. Nick Sinclair, U.S. Army
T
he post-Cold War honeymoon with Russia
is over. Russia’s seizure of the Crimea and
the subsequent conflict to annex the Donbas
imperils the legitimacy of the NATO alliance. U.S.
allies on NATO’s eastern flank foresee the same
aggression occurring in their countries and, having
endured Moscow’s suzerainty for over a half century,
these nations prefer freedom to vassalage.
Consequently, U.S. military professionals must
reacquaint themselves with the Russian way of warfare. The U.S. Army Operating Concept defines Russia
as a “competing power” and a “harbinger of future
conflict.”1 Moreover, the National Security Strategy
speaks of the United States leading the effort toward
“countering Russian aggression.”2
Russian Way of War
One element of Russian resurgence that captivates Western defense circles is the emergence of
new generation warfare (NGW). However, there is
evidence to suggest that Russian actions are not new
at all, but altogether consistent based on historical precedents. Russia has adapted its traditional
8
methods—not
created entirely
new ones—
based on political, economic,
informational,
and technological changes in the operational environment.3 Analyzing the ends, ways, and means of
NGW shows historical consistencies with Russian
approaches to warfare combined with adaptations
based on the current operational environment.
Strategic Ends
In April 2014, Janis Berzins wrote a well-received paper for Latvia’s National Defense Academy
in which he defined Russian NGW. In his paper,
Berzins argues that one aspect of Russia’s military
strategy is “doctrinal unilateralism, or the idea that
successful use of force results in legitimacy.”4 Russian
desires for security are manifested by the expansion of their borders into areas where they perceive
threats or instability. A few prominent Russian
experts note that the Russian mindset is “the best
May-June 2016 MILITARY REVIEW