Military Review English Edition July-August 2016 | Page 55

Developments in the Hemisphere Commanding General of the [Brazilian] Army Denies Possibility of Military Intervention Brazil Heloisa Cristaldo, Agência Brasil, Reporter Editor’s Note: Until fairly recently, one of the historic recurring features of many countries in Latin America has been the tendency for the military to seize power and establish military dictatorships during periods of perceived instability and unrest, unfortunately often aided and abetted by the United States for its own political purposes. However, as the various nations have become more cosmopolitan in their global connections and matured their democratic institutions and economies, including the values and internal character values of the militaries themselves, military coups have largely become a thing of the past. Irrespective, during periods of rising domestic uncertainty in some countries, there are still voices that emerge calling for active military intervention into the province of civilian rule to ensure security, order, and calm. Recently, Brazil has been facing a tumultuous political crisis as many of its democratic institutions have coalesced around an effort to impeach and remove from office President Dilma Rousseff on charges of corruption and abuse of office. One result has been calls in some quarters of Brazilian society for the Brazilian military to seize power and prevent civil unrest as supporters of the president from potentially clashing with detractors demanding her removal. It is against this background that the recent comments of the current commander of the Brazilian Army, General Eduardo Villas Bôas, are salient. They may be a possible metric of how the region’s militaries now perceive their role relative to the other institutions of democratic governance as compared to what the perceived role was in previous eras. MILITARY REVIEW  July-August 2016 T he commanding general of the [Brazilian] Army, General Eduardo Villas Bôas, today (19 April 2016) rebutted the possibility of the Armed Forces intervening in the country as a result of the current political crisis. The declaration was made during a speech about Army Day, at the private university Centro Universitário de Brasília (UniCeub). “The Armed Forces do not exist to watch over the government, nor to knock down governments. We have to contribute to the legitimacy of government, creating the conditions in which such institutions continue working and finding ways to overcome what we are experiencing. We have seen that the [political] clashes have been vicious, but the institutions are working”, he said. Villas Bôas stated that the military intervention of 1964 was an error of the Armed Forces. “Brazil from the 1930’s to 1950 was the country that grew most in the world, with Getúlio [Vargas] and Juscelino [Kubistchek]. With the military governments of the 1970’s and 1980’s, we committed an error. We allowed the division of the Cold War to affect us, which resulted in our country that had come about with a sense of progress losing cohesion”, he assessed. The military overthrow of March 31, 1964, led Brazil to the Republic’s longest period of interruption to demo- 53