Military Review English Edition July-August 2015 | Page 127

BOOK REVIEWS legal jargon while others fail to accurately describe the relevancy of their central points. Drone Wars is not for someone with limited knowledge of drones. This is a book for advanced readers with foundational knowledge on defense and policy matters and for those researching authoritative sources. A major shortcoming of Drone Wars is that the book focuses entirely on aerial drones and completely ignores the proliferation of armed maritime and land drones. An astute observer of drones, or military robotic systems, over the past fifteen years knows that drone technology is not limited to the air domain. In fact, all four U.S. military services are heavily invested through the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to develop armed maritime and land drones. Many of these new unmanned robotic systems are designed to meet the same needs as aerial drones: to save money, reduce risk, and leverage new technologies. If we are to have an open discussion on the political, legal, ethical, and moral issues surrounding the employment of armed drones, then we need to include all drone systems and types— for they will all equally change the nature of warfare no matter what domain they operate within. Lt. Col. Andrew P. Creel, U.S. Army, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas THE LONGEST AFTERNOON: The 400 Men Who Decided the Battle of Waterloo Brendan Simms, Basic Books, New York, 2015, 208 pages T he Longest Afternoon is a historical account of the Battle for the Farm of La Haye Sainte, the precursor to the Battle of Waterloo. The book is cleverly written in a third-person, omniscient narrative form. The author walks the reader through a minute-by-minute account of detailed actions by major and minor characters throughout the battle. Through his clever ability to entwine first-person accounting with historical narrative, Simms allows the reader to explore the many facets of the battle in detailed depth and vivid focus. The book spans approximately three days. Simms begins on Saturday, 17 June 1815, the day following Wellington’s Anglo-Allied army’s retreat from the MILITARY REVIEW  July-August 2015 Battle at Quatre Bras, and ends two days later, the day after the Battle for the Farm of La Haye Sainte, with the retreat of Napoleon’s French army. The main theme of the book is to account for the significance of this battle and to recognize the overwhelming impact that the bravery and courage of the 2nd Light Battalion of the King’s German Legion—part of the Anglo-Allied army—had on the final outcome. This is a very authoritative piece. Between the number of powerful first-per son accounts and detailed historical events, the book reads as a minute-by-minute eyewitness accounting. The deliberate story line and powerful detailing leaves little room for question. The greatest attraction of this book is its ability to tell the story of the battle in a very realistic sense. From the prelude to the closing chapter, the reader is left with a keen appreciation of everything from the weather and the environment to the emotions and passion of the soldiers on the battlefield. The reader is drawn into the history and given insight to feel the accountings in a very real and pragmatic fashion. The major detractor from the book is the frequent references to names and palaces. Since the focus of the book takes place in context of a larger campaign, a lack of knowledge of that campaign, the tactics of 1815, and the relevant participants at specific locations doesn’t allow a Napoleonic era novice to fully appreciate what is happening in the author’s meticulously detailed account. This is definitely not a book for someone that doesn’t already have knowledge of Napoleon, the Battle of Waterloo, or the French conquest of 1815. The book contains many lessons that make it both worthwhile and relevant to the security community. The lack of precombat checks on the part of the legionnaires almost cost them the battle as they found themselves critically low on ammunition due to a logistical oversight. Also discussed are Napoleon’s lack of tactical patience; his failure to account for the impact of environmental effects on men, weapon systems, and terrain; and, finally, how courage and timing can change the tide of combat. Were it not for the courage and tenacity of the 2nd Light Battalion to occupy and retain the Farm of La Haye Sainte, this battle could have ended much differently. Lt. Col. William Rogers, U.S. Army, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 125