Mediterranews (English) AUGUST 2016 | Page 7

TERRA NEWS 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 In nature reserves, camera traps are located strategically and rotated following a systematic methodology. Peninsula Bobcat (Lynx rufus peninsularis). Coyote (Canis latrans clepticus) in the Valle Tranquilo Nature Reserve, near El Rosario, Baja California. Gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus peninsularis) in the Punta Mazo Nature Reserve, San Quintin, Baja California. Gray fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus peninsularis). Mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus fuliginatus). Camera traps are an important tool in nature reserves managed by Terra Peninsular. According to the objectives, the team of Conservation works meticulously to place the camera traps and collect information. is done in several seasons) related to the changes in land mammals populations (p.45). Even if camera traps are relatively easy to use, it is worth highlighting that the demand of installment and review camera traps are considerable, and depends on the size and logistics of the sampling areas. Methods applied are just as important as the device: it requires logistic efforts, knowledge of the equipment, clear definition of objectives, delimitation of the area of study, consideration of the position of the sun, installment, etc. and after that, the download and detailed review of the photographic material obtained. Just as Ancrenaz et al. (2012) explained: “The use of camera traps has enormous potential for the surveying and consequent management of wildlife and can be used to answer a number of important questions; […] a successful camera trap project is very rewarding and may return results no other survey method would have provided” (p.5). Camera trapping has resulted in a helpful tool for nature reserves managed and protected by Terra Peninsular A.C. since it is a non-invasive option that allows collecting information and decision-making following the Adaptive Habitat Management program that is aligned to the objectives of conservation in Baja California. References • Ancrenaz, M., Hearn, A.J., Ross, J., Sollmann, R., y Wilting, A. (2012). Handbook for wildlife monitoring using camera traps. Recuperado de http://www.bbec.sabah.gov.my/japanese/downloads/2012/ april/camera_trap_manual_for_printing_final.pdf • Chávez, C., De la Torre, A., Bárcenas, H., Medellín, R.A., Zarza, H. y Ceballos, G. (2013). Manual de fototrampeo para estudio de fauna silvestre. El jaguar en México como estudio de caso. Alianza WWF-Telcel, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México. • Kucera, T. E., y Barrett, R. H. (1993). The Trailmaster camera system for detecting wildlife. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 21: 505-508. • Las trampas cámara (s.f.). Recuperado de http://www. semahn.chiapas.gob.mx/portal/descargas/guardaparques/articulos/LAS_TRAMPAS_CAMARAS_extensos.pdf • Monroy-Vilchis, O., Rodríguez-Soto, C., Zarco-González, M., y Urios V. (2009). Cougar and jaguar habitat use and activity patterns in Central Mexico. Animal Biology, 59: 145-157. • Naves, J., Fernández, A., Gaona, J. F., y Nores C. (1996). Uso de cámaras automáticas para la recogida de información faunística. Doñana, Acta Vertebrata, 23: 189-199. • O’Connell, A. F., Nichols, J. D. y Karanth, K. U. (Eds.) (2011). Camera traps in animal ecology: Methods and analyses. First edition. Springer, New York, New York, USA. AUGUST 2016 05