Medical Chronicle November/December 2013 | Page 27
CARDIAC
PCI: Outcomes
in women
In the US, women make up nearly
43% of all patients presenting with
an acute coronary syndrome. Early
studies have shown that women who
undergo a percutaneous coronary
intervention (PCI) have a higher
incidence of adverse outcomes during
and after PCI. It has also been
shown that women undergoing PCI
have more comorbid conditions such
as hypertension, for example, and
they have more complex and diffuse
coronary disease. In addition, they
experience longer referral times.
be able to use multivariate risk
adjustment evaluation.
4. There are currently no studies
to evaluate if the two genders
should be treated differently, for
instance, evaluating if bleeding
risk for women is larger using
certain anticoagulation.
Aim of t he study
This was a large registry type of study
that had the aim of evaluating the
predictors of one-year mortality and
major adverse cardiovascular events
(MACEs).
Method
The authors used a large PCI registry
and in a retrospectively manner
evaluated 6929 patients presenting
with an acute coronary syndrome. All
patients were followed for at least
one year for the development of death
or MACEs, which were defined as allcause mortality, myocardial infarction
and target lesion revascularisation.
Results
Women were significantly older
than men and had significantly more
diabetes, hypertension, chronic renal
insufficiency and peripheral arterial
disease than men.
At one year, women had higher
mortality than men (10.7% vs
7.5%), p <0.001 and major adverse
cardiovascular events (16.4% vs
12.7%), p <0.001.
The predictors of death common
in both genders were chronic renal
insufficiency, diabetes mellitus,
age, body mass index and baseline
haematocrit.
In women only, more complex
coronary lesions and cholesterol levels
were predictors of death.
In men only, peripheral arterial
disease and current smoking were
predictors of death.
Conclusions
1. There are differences in clinical
outcome between women
and men after PCI for acute
coronary syndromes.
2. There are also differences in the
predictors of a worse outcome
between the genders.
3. Larger studies are needed to
MEDICAL CHRONICLE NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2013 27