Maximum Yield USA 2011 July | Page 22

Hello, I’m a French journalism student in Paris, researching urban agriculture and vertical farming projects that incorporate hydroponics and aeroponics. What do you think about these vertical farm projects? Do you think that they are utopian? What are the advantages and the drawbacks of hydroponics and aeroponics? How does the quality of hydroponic/ aeroponic crops compare to crops cultivated outside in soil? Thank you for your time. Kind regards, Thibaut Forté The future of agriculture is becoming a very interesting conversation as farmers around the world struggle with more volatile weather conditions while feeding a growing population. There are many facets to the changing face of agriculture, and vertical farming is one of them. The concept of layered farming within a building is an efficient and creative opportunity. Vertical farms require supplemental lighting to ensure the plants in the middle are receiving the light required for healthy growth. This adds a large energy component to the project and the more floors there are, the more energy needed. LED lighting options might provide an alterative, but not for vining crops such as cucumbers and tomatoes, which are two of the dominant crops grown hydroponically in the world. In the short to medium term, we should look at low cost, low input models before jumping into the high cost, high input option of dedicated structures for urban agriculture. Using rooftops we already have is a good first step towards sustainable urban food production. There are a couple of problems when it comes to water-based roof gardens. The first problem is the amount of radiant heat on rooftops; this can make water temperature regulation a massive issue, especially in sensitive aeroponic systems. Also, the waste water from hydroponic 20 Maximum Yield USA | July 2011 systems still has a vast amount of soluble nutrients unused by the plants. This creates an issue of disposal. Fresh substrate would also need to be brought in between crops. Most large green roofs currently use drought-tolerant species that are planted and then basically forgotten. Now imagine the same space including people interacting with food crops. “Building food and biodiversity into a system that improves the urban environment at the same time would be such a positive step forward. ” An amazing first step in our urban food development would be to take the Cuban organoponicos concept and place it on rooftops full of shallow (12 inch) raised beds filled with soilless mix and compost. You would get the insulation value, cooling effect and water retention of a green roof along with the low cost nearly self sufficient aspect of the Cuban food experience. Building food and biodiversity into a system that improves the urban environment at the same time would be such a positive step forward. Economically speaking, the building could generate revenue by leasing this as an additional floor and it would provide opportunity for entrepreneurs looking at food production but just needing the space. A chance to get a new generation of people excited about farming? That’s always a good thing. In keeping with efficient urban farming and organoponicos, vermicomposting could supply the majority of nutrition in the soilless beds on the rooftop. A building based on green diversion could keep 30 per cent of building waste on-site to build biodiversity and feed the plants. A small portion of the garden could also be dedicated to habitat for beneficial insects, improving the balance of the space. The vertical farm is a very creative concept and will probably end up being exceptionally important in the future. Until we have worked out an efficient system and a reasonable cost, we need to adapt in different ways. Our rooftops are numerous and can provide nutritious, low impact food while reducing the heat island effect and making our cities more liveable. MY