Below I have provided six reasons why governments should not be mandating the COVID19 jab (injection), and this includes the fact that it has been falsely promoted to the public as a ‘vaccine’. But, I also note that general practitioners (GP’s). as primary care providers, are exempt from getting this injection if they are privately employed. This is stated under the NSW Public Health Orders and Restrictions and under WA Public Health Orders.
The public would like an explanation as to why privately employed GP’s and primary care providers are exempt from this injection when it is these professionals who are most exposed to this virus in clinical situations. The Australian State governments need to provide a satisfactory explanation as to why it is necessary for other professionals to be injected, but not those that are privately employed on the frontline?
The main reasons for the public to object to mandatory (coercive) policy include:
1. This is a medical intervention that has been incorrectly labelled and promoted to the public as a ‘vaccine’. The World Health Organisation (WHO) states that a vaccine protects people before they come into contact with the disease, and it prevents the transmission of the disease in the community. The Australian government regulator, the Therapeutic Goods Administrator (TGA), states that this medical intervention will not prevent you getting the disease, nor will it prevent transmission of the disease in the community. Further, the WHO definition states “……because vaccines contain only killed or weakened forms of germs, viruses, and bacteria; they do not cause the disease or put you at risk of its complications.” This medical intervention does not contain any element of the natural coronavirus 2019 that is stated to cause COVID disease. Therefore, under the WHO’s own definition this medical intervention does not fulfil the criteria of a ‘vaccine’ and it is being falsely promoted to the public to imply that the drug has beneficial properties and rare side-effects that have not been proven in any short or long-term clinical trials in humans. The fact is this is new technology that is an experiment on the population.
2. This injection contains new untested genetic technology that injects a synthetic spike protein into the human body by two different mechanisms. One of these mechanisms utilises a synthetic mRNA molecule to code for the spike protein in the human body. This genetically engineered technology is in the Moderna and Pfizer injections, and there is the potential for the mRNA molecule (nucleic acid) to insert into our own DNA to change the human blueprint for the next generation. Therefore, the full adverse health outcomes of this technology will not be known for generations to come.
There is also scientific evidence that the synthetic spike protein in all the brands will specifically target the reproductive organs. The pharmaceutical companies have stated that they have not done trials that have investigated the effects of this injection on the reproductive organs or on the carcinogenicity or toxicology of this intervention in the human body. This makes the governments COVID injection policy an experiment on the human population that is in violation of all medical ethics guidelines for doctors and all international human rights covenants that Australia has ratified.