It's a series of three injections that starts with sodium nitrate, and a couple of other sodium compounds get injected, and it changes the shape of the hemoglobin so they can bind oxygen again and win the game. Rather than these multimillion dollar hospitalizations in ICU’s with massive barrier systems and treating these people like they have Ebola or something, all we needed to do was to redirect our attention to the toxicity event, reverse the hypoxia, and then all of the downstream events--the fluid in the lungs, the subsequent pneumonias, the disseminated coagulation and heart attacks and everything else that is going to happen--would never have happened, had we treated this not as a viral infection, but actually as a poisoning.
Dr. Zach Bush (24:47):
That's where we went wrong, and in going wrong we put people on respirators and ventilators, and in so doing we radically increased mortality. New York hospitals with all of the innovations and all of the technology and all the ventilators and everything else, we reached a mortality of 88%. I don't know another condition that induces an 88% mortality across a large population.
Jefferey Smith: That’s for those people that were put on respirators.
Dr. Zach Bush (25:40): That's right. You're at a mortality level of 0.1% out in nature. You're on a mortality level of 88% in an ICU, and it just gives you this startling realization that our hospital systems and our medical care--and I include myself in this as a physician, I'm part of a machine that is systematically separating ourselves from nature.
Dr. Zach Bush (25:44):
When we see a problem, we tend to--instead of integrating that person back into nature to get them healthy again--we further draw them away from not just nature, but any of their natural processes. We put them on crappy food. We put them on tube feeds. We put them on artificial air that's forced through air conditioning systems with a very strange little niche of microbiome that can survive in antibiotic environments. You have multidrug resistant bacteria. Of course, that patient is going to get pneumonia and die. You just put them in an isolated, weird multidrug resistant bacterial field with fluids starting to accumulate into the lungs and they got poisoned at the red blood cell level and are dying of hypoxia.
Jefferey Smith (26:40)
I’m going to throw a wrench in the works here, Zach--genetic engineering of viruses. You talked about how viruses are like the patches for providing new genomic information so that our systems can then do its self repair and it can sort between what's healthy and what's not. However, that's based on a certain level of natural viral sequences. If we end up genetically engineering viruses and changing those sequences--and there's strong evidence that COVID-19 has been genetically engineered, and the key… I can go into this. I have done Facebook lives about it, I've done a podcast, I'm going to be doing more…there's a lot of very strong scientific evidence that it was genetically engineered, it’s not guaranteed, but certainly that it escaped from a laboratory in one case or the other. But let's say it was genetically engineered. Does that mean that the information that's coming into the body that's forming an upgrade might actually not be forming an upgrade, but since it's not natural and it's man-made, it might be causing devastation, in which case it might be the enemy?