These tests are not licensed diagnostic tools on their own and there is no proof that the identified 'virus' is the cause of the disease. The correct use of these tests is to assist in diagnosis when someone presents with disease symptoms for flu-like illness.
Yet hospitals are using these tests for admission to hospital for all patients, with or without flu-like illness. All positive tests are being labelled as 'cases of COVID-19 disease.' This is fraudulent and it is hiding the number of vaccinated patients that are being admitted to hospital with adverse events to the vaccine, but are testing positive to the rapid antigen test.
The identification of a virus in a person when no disease symptoms are present is falsely being labelled a ‘case’ of disease. These should be called sub-clinical infections (
or asymptomaticinfections) and they are not a risk to the community.
A sub-clinical infection means the natural immune system is functioning properly to prevent the symptoms and this will create long-term immunity for the individual and herd immunity in the community.
The pharmaceutical companies are using pseudoscience to falsely claim that the identification of a 'virus' makes you a risk to the community and this is to convince you that we need drugs called ‘vaccines’ to control infectious diseases. Vaccines were only a secondary measure brought in after the risk of death and hospitalisation was removed from most cases of infectious diseases in developed countries. Hence, they have always been voluntary.
This is the flaw in the alleged pandemic of 2020 that was based on ‘cases’ of disease (not hospitalisations or deaths) found in healthy people (no symptoms) due to the misuse and misinterpretation of a test used to screen for just one of many viruses/bacteria/non-infectious agents that cause “flu-like” illness.
The identification of viruses in healthy people is not a useful criterion for predicting health outcomes and it is not proof of causality. Pharmaceutical companies are now influencing medical professionals and governments with this false science on the screening of healthy people for viruses.
If we stop this screening, we will stop the appearance of a ‘pandemic’ that has been based on changes to definitions to suit the vaccination agenda: a goal that is profitable and can be used to monitor and control populations.
Government Childhood Vaccination Programs
Governments have been promoting childhood vaccination policies as ‘health policies’ for decades yet the health of children has significantly declined as the vaccination program expanded. This became obvious after the pharmaceutical industry received indemnity in 1986 for any ‘drug’ that is promoted as a ‘vaccine’.
This was requested because they were paying millions of dollars in compensation for vaccine injuries and deaths that are not reported by the mainstream media.
Did you know that governments do not promote vaccines to the public on the improvements in health that they produce in children or the population in general?
They promote them on the uptake rate of the drug/vaccine in the population. For example, ‘we need a 95% uptake of the vaccine for herd immunity’. People then assume that a high uptake of the drug/vaccine equals better health. <<Read more >>
Watch Interview with Dr. Judy Wilyman (18th June 2022) describing the false information that is used to promote vaccines to doctors and the public in government ‘health’ policies designed on industry-funded science.