MASS #1 | Page 29

MASS0029 Does your art define you? / It is said that you can never assume that the artist is this person that’s talking in the first person (literature), do you feel like this principle could be seen in your work or is it just pure “I’m in this and I’m going to tell you how it actually is”? n this case, it is something that I have experience with. Most of the discussions about this culture revolve around the role of technology in it and there are a lot of “emerged after AIDS” frameworks for discussing it, and those frameworks are the only ones I’ve known. A lot of people will be like, “Well this thing happened because suddenly there were these hook-up apps where you could find people within a minute of you,” but that was the context I came into sexual maturity in while growing up in London. I was immediately exposed to this, and I’ve never known a world where this wasn’t a thing. I So is it safe to assume your art based off of your own experiences? ell, I think it’s totally fair for people to make art about things that they have no expe- rience with, and I don’t wanna be like “No one can do that”, but I think I would feel weird talking about something I don’t know. I personally only feel qualified to speak about what I have expe- rienced. W So what actually differs your approach to this top- ic (as mentioned, there are different frameworks around it)? bviously I’m generalizing the main ways of approaching it.The main ways people talk about it are, firstly, the conceptual frameworks around addiction and drug use, and secondly, existing frameworks of thinking about gay male sexuality that emerged culturally and socially af- ter the AIDS crisis*. Those are the two main ways of talking about it. The majority of queer theory of the last 40 years has been pretty psychoanalytically driven, so people will be writing about death and desire O being in this eternal dance with each other be- cause people were literally dying because of the sex they were having - it’s understandable that that’s the way people have often thought about it, and there’s this high-stakes trauma to those discussions, but that’s only productive up to a point. I think there’s something kinda sad about an approach to queer sexuality that ends with deep pessimism, and that it’s always gonna be this sad, nostalgic thing that can never be the same because of this cultural trauma, or a situ- ation where you’re forced to imagine some sort of utopic elsewhere. There’s a lot of queer writ- ing that I love that’s about utopia and futurity, but I think it fails inadequate when considering this topic specifically. There’s some reason that people, gay men in particular, are doing this right now, and I think it has to do maybe with the vio- lence of masculinity and I think it has to do with homophobia.