MASS #1 ENG | Page 30

0030MASS “People will be writing about eternal dance with each literally dying because of the MASS0031 death and desire in this other because people were sex they were having.” There needs to be a way to talk about it that doesn’t just pathologize the be- haviour. So the way I’m thinking about it - I don’t necessarily have a framework for thinking about it yet, but it’s more a case of just stripping back the problems that I see with other ways of talking about it. With drug use: what is acceptable about prescribing methamphetamine-derived substances to children who can’t focus on things, or to office workers that aren’t productive enough, and then wrong about people taking it to enhance their own plea- sure? So, where do we draw that line. And then with sexuality, where is it okay... So basically it’s still an open question. Why do you choose such art mediums as sewing and performance? or me—it’s a really banal observation, but clothes and the way that people dress, it always felt really important to me. I don’t think about it that consciously, but it’s a way that I work through my own identity and the way that I think about who I am. It’s just intuitive to me that there is something queer about caring about your clothing. T F Do you think it is just a comfortable medium to go about the topics that you care about? es. This isn’t something that i’ve had to articulate in a big way, but there is this kind of relationship between fashion and queer sexuality, it has this kind of symbi- otic relationship in some ways. There has always been an obsession in queer culture with fashion and beauty. There’s this weird back and forth between them. Y Performance? ell, the idea of the performative in general seems a little overused at this point. It’s just a base- line observation for me that something like identity is performed, so performance is a natural posture for me. That just makes sense to me. W Yeah, if you made paintings on this topic, it would be less articulated. It would prob- ably leave too much space for interpreta- tion. o use an example in painting, let’s say you came away from this scene and you’re like, “Oh, I’m gonna paint men shooting up meth and having cra- zy sex,” and did a series of paintings - you wouldn’t be implicated in it, and that feels important to me. Because I have a really complicated relationship with this thing and have really compli- cated feelings about it, and if I were to make an object and throw it out into the world and say, “This is my comment on this thing” I would feel really weird that I was not attached to it anymore, even though I would be in some ways. I feel like I need to be directly implicated in the comment I’m making or the discus- sion that I want to start. Performance is my attempt to think through this, and I don’t want to put that on anyone else by representing them. In terms of my interest in what it means to represent queerness, the legibility of queer bod- ies developed out of the need to repre- sent their sickness - representations of queerness came about because people were dying, because they were seen as a threat to public health, and that was the challenge and the urgency of queer representation in the 80s and 90s. It feels like a double bind we haven’t gotten out of, that if you’re represent- ing something - it’s already overdeter- mined, you’re just kind of playing in an already-existing vocabulary. With something like performance, I think the hope is that there is something kinda provisional and experimental about it, and I like to think about it as a laborato- ry for inventing new vocabularies of ex- perience and talking about things that people are already doing but not using the vocabularies that we’ve been given already. It gets to the root of what’s actually productive about think- ing about queerness. Like, in a legalistic sense when peo- ple are like, “We want rights,” I have some sort of belief that there’s still something valuable about queerness separate from achieving equality with heteronormative relationships. I’m not interested in achieving “normality”, I think there is some other productive work.