patient safety & quality
patient safety & quality
By Kristina Pirollo-Ketchum, BA, AA, CHL, CRCST
Patient Safety Failures in Healthcare
With the erosion of standards, there are increased chances of greater failures. It renders the system weak since it is no longer running on a disciplined basis.”
Major adverse events tend to be preceded by minor incidents of missteps, which are disregarded and gradually lead to the collapse of patient safety. These small hygiene violations do not seem dangerous on their own. Nonetheless, Kirwan, et al.( 2025) indicate that they serve as early warning signs that there is a drift in the system. When companies condone such minor failures, they give variability a chance to flourish. It does not actually pose danger as the error on its own but the tolerance of the mistake.
The tolerance influences, in the course of time, expectations and minimizes vigilance. The safety erosion of patient safety is slow at the beginning, and it becomes faster when the review of the small signals is neglected instead of doing it as it should be.
Defining the‘ Small Miss’’ Every little deviation from the set hygiene or safety measures is what is termed a small miss. Some of them involve reducing the time required to disinfect patients, not taking a hand hygiene opportunity during a busy shift, and not recording it until the conclusion of the day. Others are a lack of labeling a specimen immediately or complete completion of a checklist. Such actions are hardly deliberate negligence. Rather, they are temporal reactions to time awaiting or workflow disruptions.
Employees tend to think that the risk is not much, as the deviation seems to be minor. Nevertheless, every shortcut brings deviation to systems that are to be precise. The presence of even small inconsistencies threatens to make the processes of infection prevention and patient protection weak.
Psychology of Rationalization
Healthcare settings are highly affected by operational pressures. Cognitive overload comes as a result of high patient flow, nursing staff shortages, and continuous interruption( Neumann and Purdy, 2023).
In this situation, professionals are engaged in doing the tasks that are seemingly urgent. It probably seems reasonable to shorten a cleaning step or postpone documentation in a specific moment. Employees tend to convince themselves that the diversion is a one-time affair or that it is harmless. When faced with these pressures time after time, then the rationalization is facilitated. The thing that used to be uncomfortable starts to become normal. The expectations are slightly changed, and the bar of acceptable performance is lowered.
This process of mental adaptation lessens the risk of responsiveness and increases minor deviations.
System Drift and Cultural Effect System drift starts when one tolerates minor deviation. This makes processes less predictable, as there is inconsistent application of standards. Diversity gets more and more, and protections become weaker. When the leadership reactions are not consistent, the staff members get divided messages regarding priorities. Formal policies are overtaken by informal norms with time. Observation is used to teach new employees behavior instead of written procedures. This cultural drift transforms what is acceptable in the organization.
With the erosion of standards, there are increased chances of greater failures. It renders the system weak since it is no longer running on a disciplined basis.
Micro-Corrections
Normalization of deviation is prevented by the leaders playing a critical role. Micro-correction strategies entail prompt, respectful feedback in case of minor errors. Chughtai et al.( 2023) also claim that as standards are reinforced in real-time coaching, the coaches do not blame the employees. The apparent leadership presence is an indication that details are important. Feedback loops work in short to allow staff to know what is wanted. Reinforcement leads to accountability and trust.
Timely responses by leaders ensure reliability of the systems. Making corrections as soon as possible leads to the small deviations being corrected before they become a norm.
In conclusion, high-reliability organizations react to alarm signs. They consider small hygienic overlooks as indications that attention should be given to the room. Strict attention to detail helps to maintain patient safety, and early intervention helps to keep the situation under control. Typically, the initial step in the process of patient protection is the correction of the initial minor error.
Kristina Pirollo-Ketchum, BA, AA, CHL, CRCST, is an independent consultant and principal of Ketchum Konsulting, LLC.
References:
Chughtai MS, Syed F, Naseer S and Chinchilla N.( 2023). Role of adaptive leadership in learning organizations to boost organizational innovations with change self-efficacy. Current Psychology, 1( 20), 1-20. NCBI. https:// doi. org / 10.1007 / s12144-023-04669-z
Kirwan M, Egan E and Matthews A.( 2025). Missed Nursing Care Infection Prevention and Control Practices in Acute Hospitals in Ireland During the COVID‐19 Pandemic. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 31( 5). https:// doi. org / 10.1111 / ijn. 70062
Neumann WP and Purdy N.( 2023). The better work, better care framework: 7 strategies for sustainable healthcare system process improvement. Health Systems, 12( 4), 1 – 17. https:// doi. org / 10.1080 / 20476965.2023.2198580
march-april 2026 • www. healthcarehygienemagazine. com •
33