ESG
No matter how healthy your sustainability budget is, or how recognisable your brand could be, no single company can restore a watershed, regenerate landscapes or build climate resilience on its own. Operating in isolation fragments resources, duplicates effort and massively limits impact. The biggest sustainability challenges demand collective action.
MARKETING AFRICA
ESG
Maryanne Wanjiku Nderu
From Compliance To Core Strategy: Why The Future Of Corporate Sustainability Demands " Skin In The Game "
The global corporate community is currently caught in an administrative frenzy. Driven by tightening regulations, evolving sustainability reporting requirements and shifting investor expectations, executives are racing to ensure their environmental, social and governance( ESG) disclosures look immaculate on paper.
Boardrooms across the world are dedicating countless hours to disclosures, carbon metrics and aligning with reporting frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative( GRI), the International Sustainability Standards Board( ISSB) and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive( CSRD). This is a positive step. Better reporting creates greater transparency, accountability and better-informed decision making.
But reporting, on its own, does not create impact. Compliance is the starting line. Real impact begins when organisations move beyond compliance and into strategy.
Many organisations are still stuck in the world of Instagrammable tree planting days and one-off school donations. They make for great annual integrated reports, but they are often forgotten almost as quickly as they are published. The intention is rarely the problem. Most companies genuinely want to do the right thing. The problem lies in the design.
Too often, sustainability programmes are treated as side projects rather than strategic investments. They are designed in boardrooms, implemented in organisational silos and funded through annual discretionary budgets. The result is predictable. The moment business conditions tighten, sustainability is among the first budgets to come under pressure.
The irony is that different functions within the same organisation are often investing in the same communities to achieve different objectives. Sustainability teams may be working with farmers to restore watersheds, improve biodiversity or strengthen climate resilience, while procurement teams are investing in the very same farmers to improve productivity, strengthen supply chains and secure long term access to raw materials. Both teams are creating value, yet through separate programmes, separate budgets and separate measures of success.
Imagine the value that could be created if those investments were designed together. Sustainability teams would better understand the commercial realities facing the business, while procurement teams would recognise that healthy ecosystems are essential to resilient supply chains. Instead of operating in parallel, they would be solving the same business challenge from different angles. Sustainability would no longer sit alongside the business. It would become part of how the business creates value.
If we are serious about building resilient businesses, we need to rethink the corporate sustainability playbook. Real sustainability begins by understanding your own business. Before launching external programmes, organisations must first understand their operational footprint, material dependencies and long-term risks. A project without strategy is simply expensive noise.
This is where materiality becomes so important. Every organisation has a different sustainability story because every organisation depends on different resources to succeed. For a brewery, water security is a strategic business priority. For an agricultural processor, healthy soils and resilient farming communities may be the greatest business risk. For a manufacturer, energy security and resource efficiency may matter most. For a financial institution, responsible lending, financial inclusion and strong governance may sit much higher on the agenda.
The most effective sustainability programmes are therefore not designed around what is fashionable or what generates the best publicity. They are designed around the issues that are fundamental to the long-term success of the business. Once organisations understand what is truly material, sustainability stops competing for attention. It becomes part of the decisions the business is already making.
Take East African Breweries PLC. Water is one of its most important raw materials. Investing in healthy watersheds is therefore not an act of philanthropy. It is a strategic investment in securing the availability and quality of the water that underpins its business. Communities, in turn, benefit from improved farming practices, healthier soils and more resilient livelihoods. It is a simple principle: when both business and communities’ benefit, both have a reason to protect the resource.
The same thinking is emerging across other sectors. Eni Kenya, for example, is building sustainable agricultural value chains by partnering with thousands of smallholder farmers to grow non edible oil crops for its global biorefineries. Rather than relying on volatile commodity markets, the company
No matter how healthy your sustainability budget is, or how recognisable your brand could be, no single company can restore a watershed, regenerate landscapes or build climate resilience on its own. Operating in isolation fragments resources, duplicates effort and massively limits impact. The biggest sustainability challenges demand collective action.
18 MAL73 / 26 ISSUE