MAL 30:19 MAL30 | Page 53

K enya got independence over fifty years ago and at that euphoric moment we knew that we had joined the comity of free nations and would be invited to the table as an equal partner in trying to navigate the progress of humanity that we call life. At independence we were under no illusions and we recognized that education and health were a crucial component in lifting the Kenyan populace from the indignity of poverty that we had blamed on the colonialist. It is a prudent practice for a person to occasionally take a reality check and figure out where he is at compared to where he thought he was going, and this applies to countries as well since as political and economic entities they carry the aspirations of the citizens they govern. How is it that after all those years we are still grappling with the same problem and performing poorly for that matter? Where did we go so wrong that we even hear murmurings that the country needs a revolution to get us back on track? This is a conversation we need to have as Kenyans. We need to ask the uncomfortable questions and be willing to delve into self-analysis and introspection to try and get to the bottom of our unfortunate situation which seems to be getting out of hand. The first question has to be whether we actually got independence from Britain in the same sense that the United States, Canada, Australia and India also got independence from Britain. How have we fared in comparison to those that were once subjects of the kings and queens of the United Kingdom? To attempt to answer this question we need to figure out who currently runs the world and how. In the history of the empires, Great Britain was the last of those countries that dominated the world by sheer military might and subjugated the globe and put it under colonial rule. We know from philosophical studies that leadership abhors vacuum and when Britain and other colonial powers gave up their colonies it was hoped that a body like the United Nation would fill the void and be the regulator of world affairs but this has not been the reality. Is this an indictment of our education sys- tem that we produce paper pushers and not productive workers? If we are unable to produce the requisite manpower to create economic prosperity then why are we going to school? Yet Kenyans are obsessed with school. Whoever controls the world economy by definition is the new global boss and wields the same powers as the former colonial powers did the only difference being that it is now not by the use of brutal force but by a clever manipulation of world resources. The group of nations that is dubbed the G7 that meets annually had taken over the role of the world government. This group comprises of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States. These economic powerhouses had managed to set the world agenda and they formed a world economic empire that subtly controlled the global wealth for a better part of the twentieth century and were able to maintain a skewed world economy by their collective policies. The United Nation which is a political entity that has to be funded to operate was mainly funded by these countries and therefore they were able to also set a political agenda for the world legitimized by this world body. The owner of the purse pulls the strings. To complement the role of the United Nation the World Bank was formed and it is technically a part of the United Nation system but since its voting structure is proportional to the capital shareholding of its members, it is evident that in operation it is a tool of the G7. In recognition of the changing dynamics of global environment it became necessary to expand the group of seven to incorporate the changing global economic reality and a new group of economic giants was set up to keep a tab on the economic pulse. The G20 was formed in 1999 as a forum to ostensibly discuss policies that touched on the global financial stability. The countries included were those that had strong economies and also included were various emerging markets that were showing potential. These countries included Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, European Union, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, United Kingdom and United States. To put it in perspective these countries control over 75% of the international trade, account for about 85% of the global GDP. These countries occupy about half of the earth’s land area but they make up approximately two thirds of the world population. What is worth noting is that the European Union, which is an economic bloc is represented hence all member states get a voice although technically not members of the G20. Note also that Africa has only one member, South Africa and we can question whether she really represents Africa. To set the scene for our conversation we need to also note that even in the United Nation, there are those that are more equal than others. The most powerful organ of this world governing body is the Security Council. This council comprises of fifteen members of which five are permanent members. The permanent members are China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States. Of interest is that these five nations have individual veto powers that can negate the decision of the fifteen. To paint a more balanced picture we need to have a look at the other end of the economic spectrum and here we notice that Kenya does not belong to the list of Least Developed Countries commonly known as LDCs which interestingly include Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda,