MAL 29:19 MAL 29/19 | Page 54

Corruption in Kenya is systemic and goes beyond individuals to the structural and institutional levels. In 2009, the former United States Secretary of State Clinton noted in a speech in Nairobi, ‘the absence of strong and effective democratic institutions has permitted on-going corruption, impunity, politically motivated violence and a lack of respect for a rule of law’. Clinton further said that ‘true economic progress … also depends on responsible governments that reject corruption, enforce the rule of law, and deliver results for their people’. Primary Factors The centralised and personalised presidential power that emerged under President Moi resulted in what can only be characterised as the total exercise of all power attached to national sovereignty. The result has been a perverse corruption in the country to the level of the citizenry adapting to it. It is now the norm! I was not a voter in 2002, but I remember the campaigns. Mwai Kibaki campaigned and won the hearts of Kenyans by promising to form a government that was committed to good governance and the rule of law. His campaigns were hinged on an anti-corruption fulcrum. He won by getting a whopping 62 per cent of the votes. It should be noted that it was the first time since independence that Kenya had a transfer of power through elections, and thus the beginning of some dramatic anti-corruption reforms. Every Kenyan Kibaki started well. You may recall the removal of corrupt judges, the passage of a new procurement law, and the strengthening of the Controller and Auditor General’s Office as his almost immediate actions when he took office. These resulted in a surge in national and international optimism about the direction the country was taking and expectations that improved governance would lead to a more secure and prosperous country, with less corruption. However, the early governance reforms of 2002 and 2003 soon floundered, undermined by new allegations of corruption and the resurfacing of previous ones. World Bank noted that ‘The administration’s reformist credentials were badly eroded following the revelation of a number of high-profile corruption scandals in 2006 that implicated senior members of the government’. We seemed to have gone back to our Factory Settings. What had begun as a promising experiment in governance in the African context increasingly led to disillusionment of the hopeful citizens. Decision making was paralysed by power- plays and we soon went back to the old and probably more comfortable practices of corruption, impunity, and subversion of formal institutions by informal ones. I was looking at examples of the scope and magnitude of public sector initiated, or involvement in, corruption in the Secondary Factors There are some secondary factors that have contributed to corruption in Kenya. One of these factors is the high incidence of bribery. Whatever the transaction - getting a driver’s licence, a national identity card, tax administration decisions, and government contracts for goods and/ or services, for example - it requires the bureaucratic exercise of assumed powers. This, in turn, means that bribes are demanded and have to be paid for the transactions to be completed. This can be regarded as the systematic exploitation of illegal income-earning opportunities by public officials and the enhancement of rent-seeking opportunities. Incentives for corrupt behaviour have therefore arisen in Kenya, as well as in some other African states, because public officials have considerable control over the instruments regulating valuable socio- economic benefits and private parties are willing to make illegal payments to secure those benefits. I came across several completed surveys leading to a great deal of evidence about the extent of bribery in Kenya. Transparency International-Kenya, for example, regularly publishes The Kenya Bribery Index and the East African Bribery Index which are compiled from surveys that capture bribery corruption as experienced by ordinary citizens in their interaction with officials of both public and private organisations. Surveys conducted between 2008 and 2012 indicate that between 30 and 56 per cent of respondents encountered bribery in their interactions with both public and private organisations. The bribery culture in the country has seeped into the Parliament, given the numerous accusations of bribery in the August House. The media has frequently reported corrupt dealings involving Members of Parliament inside the House, with money frequently changing hands to influence the outcome of some House This undermining of rule of law has grown to near uncontrollable levels. We started small, we have grown to levels that surprise us, can you imagine! We are now in a place where ethical leadership and public accountability are seriously lacking. We are unable to hold public officials responsible for their actions. And because the public officials know of this inability, they have grown extremely irresponsible, leading to much cynicism among Kenyans. hoped that things were getting better. country and was blown away by the lists available. Global Integrity (2009), and Wikipedia (2010), for instance, compiled timeline dossiers which put the value of these corrupt activities as hundreds of billion Kenyan shillings (tens of billion US dollars) between 1990 and 2009. This represented considerable revenue leakage with severe consequences for development and economic progress in the country. The primary cause of corruption in Kenya is therefore related to a societal state of being whereby the basic institutions that underpin and support the rule of law and good governance have been deliberately undermined or neglected to the point where they can no longer uphold the rule of law or act in the best interest of the nation. Corruption has per- sisted and increased over the years de- spite strength in the legal system because there are people in power who benefit from it and the ex- isting governance in- stitutions lack both the will and capaci- ty to stop them from doing so. The Nelson Mandela 100 Years PAPU Commemorative Stamp Issue Release Date : 9th October 2018 52 MAL29/19 ISSUE 5 www.posta.co.ke | P. O. BOX 34567 G.P.O Nairobi, Kenya | Tel: 0719 072 600, Fax: 020 020 246156