MAL 22/18 MAL 21/17 | Page 14

CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE Brand Vs. Customer Experience By Carolyne Gathuru T he Marketing Society of Kenya’s (MSK) Gala Awards that aim at raising marketing excellence in the country, sported a very interesting theme this year dubbed “Brand Vs. Consumer experience”. Interesting because of the very elements within the theme, and even more interesting because of their juxtaposition. Much has been said by management professionals world over about experience being king, and what remains to be harmonized depending on the lens through which it is viewed, is whether brand experience, consumer experience, customer experience or just plain corporate e xperience are birds of the same feather or feathers off the same bird. Taking a close look at each of the elements within the gala theme, uncovers each of them as hardwired with inputs that cut across each aspect. Brand experience in itself, with the brand being the center of focus, is a combination of the different factors that come together to define what the brand really is, what the brand stands for and the interaction of different stakeholders with it to make up their experience of it. With regards to all these experiences, it is brand experience that is generally associated with what could relatively be referred to as ‘superficial’ elements such as look and feel, and the more visual elements, as against the others that are bandied together towards touching on ‘user experience’. Brand experience is the parameter that is most associated in the brand user’s eyes with marketing and advertising, and other external facing elements, much more than its counterparts. The word brand sets Much has been said by management professionals world over about experience being king, and what remains to be harmonized depending on the lens through which it is viewed, is whether brand experience, consumer experience, customer experience or just plain corporate experience are birds of the same feather or feathers off the same bird. 12 MAL21/17 ISSUE expectations and carries with it whatever perceptions exist out in the world as what the brand actually stands for, governing the customer’s mindset as they interact with the brand from the onset. It is only those that truly understand the true definition of what a brand represents, and what it really does depict, that then hold brands to account for the entire spectrum that a brand should be accountable for; up to and including delivering on all promises made by the brand both overt and nuanced. Consumer experience on the other hand as captured in the gala’s theme, focuses on the consumer of the brand. Consumers are said to be the actual users of the brand that interact with the brand directly, and who make use of the brand be it a physical tangible product or service. Once again much has been said about customers and consumers, and in several instances these may very well happen to be one and the same person, but not exclusively so. Does that mean therefore that referring to consumers and handling customers as consumers then ostracizes the constituents that are customers but not consumers? Consumers are customers indeed, whether they physically buy the products or subscribe to or partake of the service offered by a brand, but customers are not always consumers. Focusing therefore on