Lubezine Volume 14 Sep. 2015 | Page 24

MAINTENANCE FEATURE Understanding failures in cooling system By Oliver Biyogo C Mr Biyogo is the Lubricants technical services manager at Total Kenya Limited ooling system failures is one of the most common causes of engine breakdown. It contributes more than 22% of automotive engine failures. Some of these breakdowns can be through; corrosion, • cavitation in the water pump, cylinder head and liners • Deposits that can cause blockage and abrasive wear • Damage of the water pump impeller due to coolant starvation resulting in overheating • Incompatibility with seals which leads to seal porosity and hardening which manifests itself in form of cracks that eventually cause leakages • Overheating that can have detrimental effects • Component failure due to coolant freezing(for winter environments) Cooling system failures contribution to engine breakdown is not easily discernible because it effects manifests themselves 22 indirectly. It calls for a thorough root cause analysis techniques by the maintenance personnel. A coolant formulation requirement should: Allow for Heat Transfer, provide boiling or freezing protection, and provide material protection of the components. This functionality is provided by a combination of 45%-70% Demineralised water, 25%-50% Glycol (MEG-Mono-ethylene Glycol or MPGMono-propylene Glycol) and 3%-8% additives respectively. Traditionally, pure water was used for cooling purposes because of its ability to ‘’carry’’ heat. This property is defined in physics as the heat or thermal capacity. Water posses’ excellent specific heat capacity. Other liquid substances with high heat capacity include ammonia (Used as a refrigerant), hydrogen etc. However, water has its drawbacks. It boils at 100 degrees and freezes at Zero degrees. This can pose a serious problem depending on a vehicle operating environment. Also, components exposed to plain water are susceptible to rusting and corroding. No wonder radiator repair is big business in Kenya. In some applications i.e. rail locomotives, ability to dissipate heat has a higher precedence than boiling or freezing protection. Glycol in itself as compared to water, exhibits lower thermal conductivity-ability to transfer heat (between 0.2-03 compared to 0.6 for water).In essence the technical reasoning against glycol for rail application, is it will form a ‘’thermal insulating layer’’ around the components thus jeopardising its ability to transfer heat and subsequent overheating problems. It is not strange for such application to use plain water and dosing it with a corrosion inhibitor in the cooling system. In automotive application both on-road and off-road, no OEM recommends use of water. Coolant technology is mainly classified either as mineral based or organic based. The technology could function either through formation of a protective layer on the metal surface or through oxidation which is a chemical reaction resulting in oxide formation on the metal surface. The choice of technology is dependent on technological constraints (i.e high temperature engines, material evolution of the components, and volume reduction of the engine) and environmental constraints Mineral inhibitor technology coolants are cheaper but exhibit high additive depletion, poor thermal and oxidation stability, loss of heat September 2015 • | Lubezine Magazine