Louisville Medicine Volume 68, Issue 1 | Page 22

TECHNOLOGY IN MEDICINE (continued from page 19) explaining the what, why and how of telehealth to the patients, to providing technological troubleshooting advice to those struggling with the system, to the slow process of gathering the significant amount of health-related data verbally that was routinely obtained using intake forms. DR. IT TO THE RESCUE With telehealth, it became the responsibility of the doctor to figure out how to resolve information technology (IT) problems even before the clinical visit. Telehealth visits can have technological issues not typically seen during in-person visits. Such glitches include the patient not being able to turn on their camera, microphone or speaker. I’ve had some patients who I could see through the telehealth portal, but I had to use the phone to talk to them because the audio would not come through. Sometimes the visit was going quite well until the video became glitchy or I couldn’t hear the patient, often related to either the provider’s or patient’s internet connection. During these times, they may have been in the midst of a story that I wanted to know more about, but I could no longer hear them. Unfortunately, the elderly—our most vulnerable population in terms of deaths due to COVID-19—are highly susceptible to these issues. These are the people we have tried to help avoid exposure at all costs; however, they are also the ones who are the least familiar with and lack access to the technology. Many of my elderly patients tried early on to convince me to just see them in the clinic, despite the risks. These issues have been most prominent to me in patients in nursing facilities. This population has had some of the greatest issues with spread of the virus and every time a resident has to leave the facility, they risk exposing themselves and therefore the entire facility upon return. I found it disconcerting that my patients in nursing facilities were refusing to do telehealth visits because of barriers to technology access or comprehension. Telehealth visits should be treated the same as in-person visits, with scheduled visit times, access to technology and personnel assistance as needed. THE DOCTOR MAKES (VIRTUAL) HOME CALLS AGAIN People tend to treat telehealth visits a little differently than their regular visit, and I noticed a few common scenarios. • The Shirtless Man. I’ve had several men not wearing a shirt during the visit. • The Bed Hugger. Several patients have been sitting or lying in their beds. Many people have been in their bedrooms. • The Worker and Hobbyist. I had one gentleman who was actively turkey hunting at the time of his visit (Figure 1). He had forgotten about the visit, but at least he answered the call. Evidently, my call did not scare away the turkeys because he showed his catch to me later. Other patients have been at their place of employment, whether that be in the office or on a construction site. 20 LOUISVILLE MEDICINE • The Car Passenger. Some patients did the telehealth visit while in their car. I worried that this scenario presented a peculiar liability. Rarely, a patient would start to drive, at which moment I had to inform them I would end the visit unless they stopped. • Camera Confusion. Several people have been confused with the location of the camera on the device, giving visuals of people’s foreheads, chins or a single eye alone (Figure 1). Sometimes, the visits were interrupted by family members asking the patient about something personal or where to find an item in the house. • Where’s the Child? Some parents did not realize the child (the actual patient) was supposed to be on the virtual visit, but fortunately, the child was often just in the other room since everyone was “staying safe at home.” • The On-the-Move Patient. Some people like to move around when they’re talking to someone. This is no exception when they’re using telehealth. Unfortunately, some people’s homes have different connectivity receptions at different areas of the house. I’ve had to tell these patients to stay in one place because as they traveled around the house, the audio and video quality would suffer so much I could no longer see or hear them or they couldn’t see or hear me. • The Pill Cabinet Spelunker. I have seen a lot of pill cabinets via telehealth. One benefit, I suppose, is that the doctor can get an adequate picture (literally) of the medications the patient is taking. I found out that one of my patients was taking an “as needed” medicine twice a day, a twice a day medicine as needed, and a nighttime medication in the morning. At least we are on the right track for now. GREAT EXPECTATIONS So what does the future hold for telehealth after COVID-19 is finally behind us? Is telehealth here to stay? Who will use it and for what situations? Will insurance carriers mandate that doctors do telehealth visits in certain situations or will they stop covering them again? Will insurance carriers continue to only contract with third-party venders for telehealth visits and, if so, what is the impact of this scenario on patient health from the lack of continuity of care with a patient’s established provider? Telehealth requires technology that may incur additional costs, not only for the software format but also for applications to properly process paperwork and documents in a HIPAA-secure manner. The visits may be prolonged or made impossible by technical issues. The clinician has limited capabilities in regards to physical examination and the inability to perform minor procedures virtually. These issues are some of the many topics that should be considered while these decisions unfold. As the case numbers fall and we return to a semblance of normal, this is not a time to abandon the technology. We should use this time to identify the issues and prepare for its increased use in any potential resurgence of COVID-19, or even the next pandemic. Reimbursement coverage should encourage continuity of care as