Louisville Medicine Volume 67, Issue 4 | Page 27

UNDERSTANDING INFERTILITY approach, the septum can be divided with minimal bleeding. The use of cautery is avoided in these cases to reduce the formation of intrauterine adhesions. There is no need to divide the thicker, more muscular portions of the septum, as these sites have adequate blood supply to support implantation. Laparoscopic guidance is often needed if the external contours of the uterus are indeterminate (10). Excision of vaginal septa do not improve fertility per se but are often performed to reduce discomfort with intercourse. FALLOPIAN TUBE DAMAGE Tubal factor infertility can result from any damage to the fallopian tubes. Patients most at risk for tubal damage are those with a his- tory of pelvic infections (sexually transmitted infections, STIs) like gonorrhea, chlamydia or trichomonas), multiple prior abdominal or pelvic surgeries, or even endometriosis. These can all result in blockages at any point along the course of the tube, resulting in either complete blockage which prevents fertilization or partial blockage which increases the risk of ectopic pregnancy. The most useful test to identify tubal blockage is a hysterosalpingogram or during laparoscopy with chromopertubation (Figure 5). Distal occlusions that can be corrected with laparoscopic neosalpingostomy and fimbrioplasty have a good prognosis (11). Proximal occlusions can potentially be overcome by segmental resection and reanastomosis. In cases where a tube is too damaged to be repaired, the best course for pregnancy success may be removing it, as certain kinds of tubal damage can even impair attempts at in vitro fertilization (IVF) (11). For some patients, damage to the fallopian tubes was intentional with a sterilization procedure. Obviously, bilateral salpingectomy leaves a patient with only IVF or gestational carrier as options for future pregnancy. Reversal, however, may be possible after traditional bilateral tubal ligation via tubal reanastomosis, though success rates are variable (12). Details about the exact method of the prior tubal ligation is essential to appropriately counsel patients regarding feasibility of this option. Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion (Essure) has largely fallen out of favor due to unforeseen development of long term pelvic pain due to the occlusive implants used. While the implants can be removed, this procedure is typically accompanied by bilateral salpingectomy rather than reanastomosis. Data about pregnancy after reversal of this procedure is scarce and largely anecdotal. Rates of ectopic pregnancy are increased after tubal surgery compared to IVF, 2 to10% and 2%, respectively (11). CONCLUSION While the causes of infertility discussed in this article are some of the most common, there are also many others and, frequently, more than one at a time are identified. Patients struggling with infertility or pregnancy loss should seek consultation with a qualified obste- trician-gynecologist. Dr. Ginn and Dr. Reinstine practice obstetrics-gynecology and are associated with Norton Health Care. Hysterosalpingogram: Case courtesy of Dr. Matt A. Morgan, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 41788 REFERENCES ASRM Practice Committee. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile female: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:344-50. Marsh EE et al. Racial differences in fibroid prevalence and ultrasound findings in asymptomatic young women (18-30 years old): a pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2018;99(7):1951-7. Baird DD et al. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(1):100. ASRM Practice Committee. Removal of myomas in asymptomatic patients to improve fertility and/or reduce miscarriage rate: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:416-25. Macer ML, Taylor HS. Endometriosis and infertility: a review of the patho- genesis and treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2012;39(4):535-49. Marcoux S et al. Laparoscopic surgery in infertile women with minimal or mild endometriosis. Canadian Collaborative Group on Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(4):217-22. Alborzi S et al. The impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian re- serve in patients with unilateral and bilateral endometriomas. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2):427-34. Rodriguez-Tarrega E. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the usefulness of GnRH agonist versus placebo on the outcome of IVF in infertile patients with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(suppl 1). Hamdan M et al. The impact of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(6):809-25. Vercellini P et al. Hysteroscopic metroplasty with resectoscope or microscissors for the correction of septate uterus. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 May;176(5):439- 42. ASRM Practice Committee. Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted re- productive technology: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:539-45. Yoon TK et al. Fertility outcome after laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anas- tomosis. Fertil Steril. 1997:67(1):18. SEPTEMBER 2019 25