Louisville Medicine Volume 66, Issue 3 | Page 17

VIOLENCE intellectual effort has traditionally been focused on Non-Accidental Trauma (NAT). While the term is broad in scope, it typically refers to a child who is injured deliberately, usually by blunt mechanism. At the governmental and provider levels, a tremendous amount of effort has been directed at the identification, treatment and preven- tion of these types of violent injuries. Providers are required by law to report suspected cases of NAT to local Child Protective Services (CPS), so that an appropriate investigation can be undertaken to determine the safety of the child’s living environment. Court orders can be obtained through those investigations to remove the child from unsafe situations. Forensics experts are increasingly available in major children’s hospitals, and use their expertise in patterns of deliberate injury to assist with both the CPS investigation and direct treatment of the child’s injuries. Within our institution, educational videos for new parents - now legally required in Kentucky prior to the baby’s discharge - explain to them the devastating effects of Shaken Baby Syndrome. Pediatric firearm injuries have historically received less attention and effort from our health care system than have other forms of violent trauma. This may be due to the perception these injuries don’t occur with the same frequency or severity as seen in adults. It may also be because other forms of violent trauma are more per- vasive in our patient population. However, a review of our trauma registry data at Norton Children’s Hospital demonstrates that gun related injury is a significant and increasing issue for children in our community. In the last eight years, 113 patients have been treated here, with an average of 10 per year between 2010-2014, but more than 20 per year since 2015 - without a change in the overall number of trauma admissions. Average victim age has been stable at just over nine years. Overall mortality from these injuries has been 13.7 percent over the entire time period; in almost all cases, devastating traumatic brain injury is the cause. This mortality rate far eclipses that for any other type of injury seen by our institution, with the exception of severe traumatic brain injury from NAT in the neonatal and infant population. While the majority of adult gunshot wound victims are injured with intent, this has largely not been the case in our pediatric pop- ulation. For all patients treated at our institution during the years 2010-2107, 75.2 percent (85/115) were injured unintentionally. When considering patients 12 years of age or younger, this percent- age increased to 95.3 percent (48/51). Common mechanisms for unintentional gun injury included self-inflicted injuries sustained when a small child picked up a gun in the house, one child acciden- tally shooting another while playing with an adult’s gun, injuries sustained with adults while hunting or cleaning a gun, and injuries sustained from proximity to a violent confrontation. Unfortunately, the tendency towards unintentional injury in younger children does not equate to decreased severity of injury or any survival advantage. The average age of the patients who died during the reviewed time period was nine years (age range 1-16). Of the 15 patients who died, 67 percent were under the age of 10, and all of these patients were injured without intent. Among the intentional gunshot wounds treated at our institution, almost all were single or group related violence events in which the victim was either a participant or the intended target. This type of injury was nearly exclusively limited to our adolescent population. Interestingly, the mortality rate was actually significantly lower in this group of patients (2.7 percent) than in the group overall. These injuries tended to be non-fatal extremity or superficial chest wounds in our population. Many were discharged from the emergency de- partment after being evaluated. There were two suicide attempts, both in adolescent, both of whom died from their injuries. Children have a remarkable ability to tolerate and recover from injury. It is not surprising that of the 98 patients who ultimately survived to discharge, only two required inpatient rehabilitation before going home. An additional two had brain injuries severe enough that they did not qualify for inpatient rehabilitation, and were ultimately sent to long-term care facilities. The overwhelming majority of patients who survived were discharged in good condition to home, and made complete recoveries. Although historically perceived as isolated, relatively rare events, gunshot wounds cause significant morbidity and mortality in our pediatric population. As care providers for children, we are seeing more of these events over time. This is not a problem limited to violent adolescents. These injuries are occurring in infants and small children, they are occurring accidentally due to careless handling of guns, and they are causing deaths. Although pediatric survivors of gunshot wounds typically recover well, they can have hospital stays which are physically and psychologically difficult for them, and ex- tremely stressful for their parents. It cannot be stressed enough that the majority of these injuries are both unintentional and preventable. More effort needs to be directed toward education regarding the handling and storage of firearms in households where children are present, and the support of legislation that would directly or indirectly restrict the access of children to guns. Dr. Foley is a practicing Associate Professor of Surgery and Pediatrics for the UofL School of Medicine as well as the Medical Director of Trauma and Burn Care and Norton Children’s Hospital. AUGUST 2018 15