Louisville Medicine Volume 64, Issue 11 | Page 28

DOCTORS’ LOUNGE (continued from page 25) allow. Since they are also working full time and cannot sit on hold forever in an endless phone tree of hospital financial advisors, they generally cannot find out. They can search the CMS website for doctor rank- ings and success of total joint replacement rankings and heart surgery rankings and so on, but getting a solid out-of-pocket cost number that includes the doctor, the anesthesia, the pre-admission testing, the hospitalist, and the hospital drugs/thera- py/nursing charges together - it’s not just herculean, it’s impossible. Other authors in the NEJM have ad- dressed this issue recently as well. Drs. Ravi Parikh, Arnold Milstein, and Sachin Jain in the March 9 th issue made strong new recom- mendations for how we educate medical stu- dents and housestaff about the cost of care. They pointed out that dollar signs on EMR formularies and pressure from hospital care management specialists to discharge those who no longer meet “inpatient severity” serve to highlight the cost to the hospital or the government. They note, “In current education on health care costs, we learn to answer the question, 'How Much?' But we fail to ask, 'For Whom?' Costs are different for different stakeholders.” Our primary responsibility as physicians is always to the patient. Always, always, al- ways and forever do I worry how much my medical fears, on their behalf, will cost them. I am anxious that they suffer not; I am anxious that I won’t miss something danger- ous or wait too long and let a serious illness become a life-threatening one; I worry that the medicine that works the best is the most expensive one, but prescribing a cheaper one might work out better in the long run, since that respects their actual ability to fill the prescription. Physical therapy can work so many wonders, but for commercially in- sured patients, it is often out of reach inside that $5,000 deductible. The doctor in training is trying to figure out what is wrong and how to fix it, and care might involve multiple consultants and tests, and result in post-discharge follow-ups and medications and PT that the patient has no intention or capacity to afford. Only 20-40 percent of eligible patients complete all of their Cardiac Rehab because of the cost. What happens then? They get worse again. These authors recommend med student/ patient shadowing for a full day of health care, home visits, and care coordination by students so they see firsthand the logistics, the bus fares, the copays, the missed work hours, the child care arrangements, etc. etc. - all of which empty the patient’s pockets. They recommend that we keep in mind that what is cheaper for the institution often means cost-shifting directly to the patient. They recommend computer algorithms that demonstrate costs to all the stakeholders, so that we can be aware of the pressures on each. I recommend, as Congress goes through the process of what has been called “repeal and replace” for many years now, that they remember the economic point of all this: have children grow up healthy to become adults who are well and working; and care for the old and disabled humanely and well. Research done by Dr. Goodman-Bacon for the National Bureau of Economic Research in Dec. showed that Medicaid use in child- hood led to better health and lower use of public benefits in adulthood. He stated that Medicaid policy currently saves federal and state governments $21 billion yearly overall. Then, of course, at least if you believe the health insurance companies’ ads, there’s compassion for one’s fellow human, too. I hope to see lots of that soon. Dr. Barry practices Internal Medicine with Norton Community Medical Associates-Bar- ret. She is a clinical associate professor at the University of Louisville School of Medicine, Department of Medicine. NOTE: Due to the intensity of the current political environment, we remind readers that this section (Doctors' Lounge) is reserved for unadulterated opinion. The following articles are not the opinion of GLMS. Its important for members to have open, insightful dialogue and debate on issues far and wide. If you are stirred by any article, whether in agreement or disagreement, please respond with a letter to the editor. Send to Aaron Burch at [email protected] or 328 E. Main St. Louisville, KY 40202. 26 LOUISVILLE MEDICINE