Louisville Medicine Volume 63, Issue 2 | Page 27

PHYSICIAN-IN-TRAINING/MEDICAL STUDENT CATEGORY 2015 RICHARD SPEAR, MD, MEMORIAL ESSAY CONTEST on his body and the lack of compliance with the daily prophylaxis for his CGD, whether due to lack of education, poverty, or flat out neglect. Mom had been prepared for this outcome, but we couldn’t know for certain if she really knew the consequences of the decision. If the child knew, then he gave no indication to that effect. The intern lifted up the receiver and asked for Spanish. Mom was given the other phone. Both mom and child looked up expectantly. Updates and instructions relating to purely medical care were offered first. Then came the unsavory news and it was so seamlessly incorporated into the spiel that it almost seemed like a matter of routine care. The proverbial bandaid had been ripped off, compliments of a third party interpreter. I held my breath waiting for the reaction that I felt would likely be an outburst of histrionics. But, mom and child both dimly nodded- yes. No tears or tantrums. Whether this was because they already knew what was coming or were uncomfortable reacting so emotionally in the presence of a group of masked strangers or they hadn’t had time to fully process the news, we didn’t know. The intern confirmed that mom understood what had been said and she again nodded, yes. Both receivers were set down. The attending, seated on the bed, lightly patted the child’s back and told him to continue to be good, that he had a bright future ahead of him. Then, we took our leave. This experience represented a microcosm of the remote language interpretation experience. I think the situation was dealt with appropriately and compassionately, considering the imprecise science of the interpreter phone and the sensitive nature of what had to be said. Nonverbal attempts at rapport and compassion were the rule, rather than the exception. Despite care in making eye contact and involving mom in the discussion however, it was obvious that the phone represented an ultimately inadequate compromise between relatability and communication. The impersonal nature of the technology, the extent to which it depends entirely on objective words to the exclusion of very human mechanisms of understanding and empathy, and the reliance on a stranger’s interpretation for comprehension make it a tenuous technology at best, albeit a necessary one. Since it is not feasible to have human interpreters on hand for every encounter with an exclusively non-English speaking patient or family, these drawbacks have been rendered forcefully palatable. But we don’t have to swallow them whole. The key is to remember that the phone does not excuse us from trying to build rapport the same way we do with all patients. It does not and cannot perfectly relay the information we would like to get across (such is language interpretation). It has the capacity to stifle discussion and questions, thereby making it necessary for us to find ways to rekindle that exchange of ideas. It can make patients and their families feel vulnerable and uncomfortable. Gestures like a smile are universally understood and can and should be used liberally. We do not want to let it become, as Albert Einstein once said, “appallingly obvious that technology has exceeded our humanity.” The child and his mother likely will not remember the exact words used to describe his current condition or even the way in which they were told about his ‘disposition’ to foster care, but there is solace in thinking they might recall the gentle smiles, the reassuring glances, and the tender pats on the back that they received from their physicians. Note: Sarah Khayat will be a fourth year medical student at the University of Louisville this fall. The Richard Spear, MD, Memorial Essay Contest is a yearly writing competition hosted by the Greater Louisville Medical Society. Dr. Richard Spear, a respected Louisville general surgeon, passed away in 2007 and left GLMS a bequest to fund an annual essay contest. To view the Richard Spear, MD, Memorial Essay Contest archives, visit www.glms.org/Default.aspx?PageID=530. JULY 2015 25