Louisville Medicine Volume 62, Issue 4 | Page 31

GLMS POLICY AND ADVOCACY IN 2014 Tracy L. Ragland, MD T he GLMS Policy and Advocacy Team was very active during the 2014 session of the Kentucky General Assembly. We personally interacted with nearly every member of the Jefferson County Delegation, the majority of leadership in both the House and Senate, and several legislators representing other areas of the Commonwealth. After hosting a reception for the Delegation in early January, GLMS had a presence weekly in Frankfort until the end of the session in April. Team members attended committee meetings, offered formal testimony in hearings, met individually with legislators, and took part in rallies and press conferences in support of efforts to improve Kentucky’s healthcare environment. At the start of the session, the team focused on four pieces of legislation: SmokeFree Kentucky (SB 117 and HB 173), a proposal to ban smoking in public spaces throughout our state; Expert Witness Requirement (SB 134), a long-supported idea to require board certification and significant local experience in a physician-defendant’s specialty as a prerequisite for physicians who wish to work as paid experts in medical malpractice suits in Kentucky; MOST (HB 145), a proposal to establish a Medical Order for Scope of Treatment, a standardized, portable, and physician-signed form that documents a patient’s health care decisions; and Good Samaritan/911 -- SB 62, a straightforward bill that proposed allowing limited immunity from prosecution for people who call 911 or another authority upon witnessing a potential overdose taking place, and SB 5, an omnibus bill that included SB 62’s language in addition to a very controversial measure that would have required homicide convictions for people, including addicts, found guilty of indirectly causing on overdose death by selling drugs to an individual who then dies or miscarries as a result of taking them. As the weeks went on, the Team ended up actively supporting 5 other bills as well: Prescription Eye Drops (SB 118), which allows for health plan coverage of more frequent refills of prescription eye drops; Medical Review Panels (SB 119); Tanning Bed Restrictions (HB 310), a proposal to prohibit children under the age of 18 from using a tanning bed without a prescription from a physician; Pediatric Abusive Head Trauma (HB 157), which established both a requirement for a one time CME on recognizing head trauma in children for Pediatricians, Family Physicians, Emergency Physicians, Urgent Care Physicians, and Radiologists, as well as a sunsetting of the current HIV CME requirement for all Kentucky physicians; and Insurance Opt Out legislation (SB 185), a bill that would make it illegal for an insurance company to create a situation where a provider is automatically in agreement to a contract change or new product offering (with no requirement for meaningful communication on the change) unless he or she “opts out” of the agreement. For a variety of reasons, only Prescription Eye Drops and Pediatric Abusive HeadTrauma successfully passed both chambers and were signed into law. Strong opinions of several legislators and their constituents on politically divisive issues such as property rights and individual liberty, an individual’s right to life versus right to choose across the entire life spectrum, and the ongoing so-called war on drugs negatively affected the outcome of SmokeFree Kentucky, Tanning Bed Restrictions, MOST, and Good Samaritan-911. Likewise, the ongoing opposition to anything resembling tort reform by most leaders in the House harmed H