Louisville Medicine Volume 62, Issue 2 | Page 23

Practicing and Life Member CategorY Winner 2014 Richard Spear, MD, Memorial Essay Contest changing environment can be as much a misnomer as progress. The transition from independent practitioner and small business owner offers new opportunities to witness government bureaucracy and waste on a microcosmic scale. Gambler. An actuary applies statistical modeling to determine risk. My decision to enter medical school was made with far less analysis than when setting the terms of an insurance policy. Success has been the result of providence, not planning. Today’s new physicians cannot rely on dumb luck as I did. Escalating tuition, the unsustainability of healthcare expenditures, and the downward trajectory of physician compensation make any benefit/risk analysis of whether to become a physician conjecture at best. We have no idea where health care will be in five years, much less twenty, and so embarking on a path to a medical degree is a financial crapshoot. Heir. Since beginning my clinical career, I learned many truths, tricks and efficiencies to improve my practice, but I have never made a medical discovery. If you are like me, you relied on the instruction and innovation of our medical forefathers. Lister, Halsted and DeBakey are distant names on my ancestral tree. The names of medical relatives like Polk and Ernst are nearer to my own, and their faces are familiar to me, and mine to them. The practice of medicine is a fluid product of the vast legacy of curious thinkers and daring innovators who may never have witnessed the profound impact and geometric spread of their contributions. Lobbyist. The surgeon general is the most high profile health policy intercessor. But local physicians argue in the names of just causes like air quality, fitness, colon cancer screening and heart disease in women. A few petition in a judicial rather than legislative sense, as when a forensic pathologist seeks justice for a victim who has been forever silenced. We long to make lasting differences on our patient’s lives. Sometimes it is the system that needs a doctor. Patient. After deponent, “patient” is the second least favorable name I am called. But as terrible tasting medicine can lead to a cure, switching roles is an unpleasant route to empathy. We are subject to the same afflictions facing our patients. As the passage of time accelerates, our humanity and mortality confront us squarely in the form of a hospital gown. Provider. This is a new nickname for us, applied with increasing frequency. It represents the most commonly used alias for physician since the turn of the millennium. For me it is dual in its connotation. It leaves me with a chilly, impersonal feeling when used by members of my own health care organization, when I expected something warmer. And it is demeaning when used by insurance carriers, employers, and licensing organizations, when I expected something more respectful. Unwelcome nicknames sometimes stick. Public enemy. Whether ambushed by a doctor joke, or harpooned blatantly by a critic, many physicians have felt accusatory fingers drawing a bead on our profession, and maybe on us personally. As suspected perpetrators of public maleficence, we are alleged to be money-hungry vultures, earning our living from others’ suffering. We hear we shirk responsibility for errors by “burying our mistakes.” Influences beyond our control force patient interactions to be efficient and focused, and we appear aloof, uncaring and rushed. Angry patients transitioning from one physician to another often bash the former. As I listen I wonder if someday the same patient will someday impugn my care to another physician. The barbs sting the most when the accusations are true. Savior. Fortunately this name is applied rarely, as overuse causes encephalomegaly. Depending on our specialty, we might wrestle patients from the jaws of death frequently. But most of us live quiet lives of daily routine, only occasionally making r YX