Louisville Medicine Volume 61, Issue 11 | Page 16

Did You Get That? — Evolution in Physician Learning Thomas James III, MD R eturning to Philadelphia where I did my residencies several decades ago has dramatized for me the changes in physician education over time. Back in the prior millennium, medical education was based on the didactic principles handed down from Sir William Osler’s time. The knowledge hierarchy was dictated by the length of the lab coat. Learning was based upon textbooks, journal clubs, and bedside experience. Dr. Gene Stead at Duke University was well recognized for his belief in experiential learning, having interns work 36 hours in the hospital and with only 12 hours off. He worried that there would be no learning during that 12 hours out of the hospital. Many of us were thankful for every-third night schedules. But the concept was that through both a disciplined work ethic and high exposure to hospital patients, for young physicians would maximize the learning experience. The concept of evidence-based medicine revolved around quoting recent articles from prestigious medical journals. Guidelines were considered “cookbook medicine” as the prevailing view of medicine was that of an intricate and complex art. More contemporarily trained physicians are more likely to have access to facts, protocols and evidence-based medicine. Much of the traditional lectures and presentations remain. Experience on the hospital floor has been reduced as part of the efforts to reduce fatigue-associated medical errors. While internet websites with high quality professionally-oriented information are now used by doctors across the age spectrum, it is the younger physicians who are more likely to go to Wikipedia, YouTube or even Facebook for information and professional information exchanges. Younger physicians mirror their contemporaries with an 86% adoption of social media in the 18 to 29 year age cohort. It is clearly evident that younger physicians in practice today are much more facile with internet learning, just as older physicians felt comfort with learning in group discussions while gathered around some poor sick patient. Medical education is changing its venue and its processes. The basic tenets of adult learning have to be considered since once a physician leaves training, formal learning processes change. Dr. Malcolm Knowles has indicated that such learning recognizes that 14 LOUISVILLE MEDICINE adults (including practicing physicians) bring experience to help frame the new knowledge presented to them. Most adults learn from task-oriented situations, so become ready to learn when the adult feels it is important and relevant information. Further, learning preferences involve the same domains of learning styles for physicians as they do for other adults. These domains include preferences for visual, auditory or kinesthetic learning. Most adults use a combination of these three styles but with individualized preferences. Additionally, work on adult learning shows that intentional, spaced repetition of information increases retention by 50%. Studies show that we retain roughly 10% of visually presented information, 30 to 40% of material heard via lecture or group discussion, and 90% of what is based upon experience supplemented by visual and auditory information. But there are barriers to the implementation of new learning into the physician’s practice. The adoption of evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been the most widely studied. In part this is also a reflection of the prevailing view in “Quality Circles” and in Washington that health outcomes of the population will improve if physicians just practiced more evidence-based medicine. So physician adoption of HEDIS and NCQA measures (that demonstrate practical use of EBM) makes a convenient and a politically correct area to study physician learning and practice barriers. Zwolsman et al performed a meta-analysis of the barriers experienced by primary care physicians in the UK and found that the principal barriers to physician adoption of evidenced-based medicine involved a number of issues: • Physician concern with the evidence: the doctor may q